NO, Our Intelligence DID NOT Prove That Putin Meddled In Our Election – IOTW Report

NO, Our Intelligence DID NOT Prove That Putin Meddled In Our Election

I will take our intelligence agencies at their word that they uncovered evidence that “Russians” meddled in our election. Where is the evidence that “Russians” equals Putin?

How many scandals were there over the past 8 years of Obama’s administration where the buck never got to the oval office?

For example, the IRS scandal was just rogue agents in Cincinnati acting sloppily, miles apart from Obama.

When the New Black Panthers were meddling in our elections by manning polling stations, jackbooted with batons and resting bitch faces, the Obama DOJ dropped the charges?

The left would object to me calling it the Obama DOJ, implying that Obama had anything at all to do with the DOJ decision. Remember, Obama was scandal free without a smidgen of corruption.

Putin is not afforded this same buffer.

There are no rogue agents in Chernushka that Putin doesn’t know about. Every Russian was personally ordered by Putin to carry out whatever act they committed, just as every hacker in the United States was the personal responsibility of Obama.

I hate to be put in the position of defending Putin, but by proxy what I am actually doing is defending our president. The left is using hacking by the Russians (hacking that they’ve never proven influenced our election) to not only delegitimize our president, but to also say Trump was a part of this hacking, working in concert with Russia, AKA: collusion, in order to defeat the mighty Hillary Clinton. These are the dots the left connects.

The left has endangered our country, in that, as the United States seeks to normalize relations with a country that #NeverTrump Mitt Romney identified as the biggest looming danger on the horizon, this becomes proof that Trump is weak, Trump is Putin’s puppet,  Trump is treasonous, Trump must be removed, HILLARY WON!

Dots ridiculous.

 

 

18 Comments on NO, Our Intelligence DID NOT Prove That Putin Meddled In Our Election

  1. Pootin dropped a MAOB yesterday when he brought up Mr. Browder. I’m sure Trump already knew about him, that’s why he called for the summit in the first place. To give Vlad the opportunity to tell on Hillary. The defacation is about to contact the rotary oscillator.

    13
  2. “I will take our intelligence agencies at their word that they uncovered evidence that “Russians” meddled in our election.”

    WHY?!?!
    I know you’re setting up a premise, BUT
    since they were totally incurious about BRAZEN CRIMINALS that are known to the public (i.e. Hillary Clinton and many obola and W flunkies) why should anyone believe these PARTISAN HACKS as they perpetrate an obviously fraudulent campaign against a US President who has repeatedly proven his detractors to be self-serving LIARS.

    Their word is shit. Today, when Putin was accused of assassinating political rivals, he deflected and righteously turned the table on our vaunted intelligence agency: “What about American Presidents who were killed? Kennedy wasn’t killed in Russia.”

    Well?! With the brazen deceit of the never-released Warren Report, how noble are our spooks?

    7
  3. The global elite has been destroying white European culture (U.S. included) for some time. Today is has reached the point of outright demonizing white people. What the globalists fears most is peace between the U.S. and Russia, the two largest white nations. The rift between them has heretofore been socially engineered. If a compact between the two nations occur it will be all over for the globalists.

    8
  4. Under Obama, the State Dept, White House, USPS and NOAA were all hacked and we were told that we wouldn’t be able to track those hackings back to their source because of all the counter-measures taken to avoid detection. Yet we’re supposed to believe that the hacking of DNC emails could be traced directly back to 12 specific Russians??

    6
  5. Some good points.
    How many times have we heard about the Russian mob?
    About how ruthless they are and about all the different areas of the criminal world they are involved in?
    Could have been them.
    Could have been Putin’s people so Putin can have plausible deniability.
    Could be, could be, could be.
    Like a friend of mine pointed out, if they never got a look at the Dem servers or Hillary’s servers how do they know?

    7
  6. They never even looked at the “hacked” servers.

    They let Imran Awan go with a slap on the wrist.

    And where are Stefan Halper and Josef Mifsud?

    The whole thing is a mockery of a sham of a train wreck of an investigation.

    9
  7. It goes right back to the former CIA Director / greatest Bush ever, GHW Bush. During his administration, the rocks crumbled and Bush backed off. The commies morphed into the “fresh-faced” leaders of tomorrow, so long as one had money to give them. Thus, the Russia that exists today has come full circle to bite the intelligenceleftistglobullBushies in the backside.
    Star Trek VI The Undiscovered Country Part II.

    6
  8. Hmmm…16 years ago a Republican president believed his intelligence officers (mostly put in place by his Democrat predecessor) regarding WMD in Iraq, and got lambasted by the media for doing so. Fast forward, a Republican president hesitates to believe his intelligence officers (mostly put in place by his Democrat predecessor) and the media ridicules him. But this time, we seem to have evidence that said intelligence community hates the president and is actively working to undermine him. Probably the same situation existed for GWB but it didn’t get the same attention.

    9
  9. Whether you agree with Trump or not, you have to concede Putin’s point that legal processes crossing international boundaries are subject to international norms and treaties. The law flows both ways: Reciprocity can be a b*tch.

    3
  10. Still waiting for a definition of “election”, as in something to be “interfered with”, let alone “hacked”.

    What’s that mean? Were Russians actively blocking people from going to the polls? Stealing absentee ballots? Altering voting machine tallies? Downing the websites of election supervisors?

    4
  11. Fur, *I* am not certain the Russians did anything at all. There certainly were a lot of internal thefts of information (by folk disillusioned by Hillary) and, perhaps, some amateur phishing that caught Podesta, but….. Russians?

    In any event, the DNC and DCCC servers have a lot of talking to do, as do Julian Assange and KimDotCom, not to mention California’s now Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, who wiped and replaced a House server used by the Awan boys that was subpoenaed as evidence. (Amazing how progs cheat and — to date — have not been caught!)

    The mantra “The Russians Did It” is only to be believed by unthinking fools. Sadly, they are very loud, are they not? ….Lady in Red

    7
  12. You have to commiserate with President Trump. He can’t trust his DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA and various other alphabet companies that we will never hear of. He has discovered that the swamp is considerably deeper and more densely populated than was previously thought. Even though the media’s reputation has been severely damaged they continue to fabricate damaging lies then put release them as facts that some low IQ people accept as true.
    Every swamp critter is threatened by the unmasking that is occurring as we speak and will do anything to preserve their status quo.
    The wind did it is just a valid excuse as Russian collusion. Standing by the democrat version of the Bart Simpson excuse of I didn’t do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can’t prove a thing is not going to work much longer.
    When the fecal matter impacts the rotary oscillator I hope the secret service is capable of defending our president. It is apparent that there are no limits that the swamp critters will not go to.

    2
  13. Same intelligence (deep state) agencies that got us into a war in Iraq are the actors who are out trying to destroy Trump. Why should he believe them? I don’t. Weren’t we just talking about how the CIA has keystroke programs that make it look like the CIA’s hacking attacks were done by the Russians.

    The CIA had a special programme allowing it to trick people into thinking they had been hacked by other countries, according to WikiLeaks.

    The agency was cataloguing the hacking methods of outside cyber attackers, including those from Russia, according to files published by the organisation. Once it had them catalogued, it could use them to break into other countries or people’s computers or phones – making it look like a different country had done so.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/wikileaks-files-cia-umbrage-hacker-secret-spies-explained-countries-donald-trump-russia-a7618661.html%3famp

    2
  14. Supposedly, Seth Rich was murdered because he was leaking to Wikileaks. I think there’s more to it than that. I believe that he was going to leak information about the Amran family being Pakistani spies who were employed by DWS and who hacked (given access) the DNC servers. I don’t think the Russians were involved at all. I think this is all smoke and mirrors to cover up the high crimes and misdemeanors of the Obama administration and the gross negligence of the Democrat party.

    Boom.

    3

Comments are closed.