Oklahoma Court Will Not Call Forcible Oral Sex “Rape” – IOTW Report

Oklahoma Court Will Not Call Forcible Oral Sex “Rape”

A 16 year-old girl woke up out of a drunken stupor with “evidence” in and around her mouth that the 17 year-old boy who drove her home had his way with her.

The courts ruled that this was not forcible rape because force wasn’t necessary, and the way the sodomy law is written, separating sodomy from rape, they wouldn’t/couldn’t charge him with forcible rape.

It seems the guy found a weird loophole in the law, one that needs to be closed immediately.

Bill Clinton was last seen heading for Oklahoma.

 

16 Comments on Oklahoma Court Will Not Call Forcible Oral Sex “Rape”

  1. That 17-yr-old needs to be punished, and punished severely.

    Yah, and no force required? Unless she happened to be passed out and lying in just the right position, he’d have had to use a little force just to roll her over!

    But to those who think the judge should have said it was indeed rape and gone ahead with a trial, you do realize that if he did that when the law, screwed up though it is, says otherwise he’d be engaging in judicial activism, right?

  2. Don’t know about Oklahoma, but under NY law, Sodomy in the First and Rape in the First carry the same mandatory sentences as both are violent felonies–and they are totally different acts under NY’s definitions.

  3. Hold the phone!
    “A drunken stupor”
    That must have been why Eleanor never moved and then always threw up after we…did it.

    Thanks, BFH. Same time next week?

  4. Franklin, Ken Burns said nothing about yours and Eleanor’s sex in his PBS special on “The Roosevelts: An Intimate History.”

    …Thank Gawd. 😯

Comments are closed.