Paul Ryan’s Hat is NOT in the ring – “Period. End of Story.” – IOTW Report

Paul Ryan’s Hat is NOT in the ring – “Period. End of Story.”

UPI

“I’d like to think my face is somewhat fresh, but I’m not for this conversation. I think you need to run for president if you’re going to run for president, and I’m not running for president. Period, end of story,” Ryan said.

“I do believe people put my name in this thing, and I say, ‘get my name out of that,'” Ryan said, alluding to the fact that some in the GOP leadership have proposed Ryan’s candidacy without Ryan’s expressed approval.

Ryan also said he is worried July’s Republican National Committee, in which the GOP presidential nominee will be decided, will have different rules than the 2012 convention — particularly a rule that requires candidates to have the majority support of at least eight state delegations.

“That is going to be up to the delegates. I’m going to be an honest broker and make sure that the convention follows the rules as the delegates make the rules,” Ryan added. “It should not be our decision as leaders. It is the delegates’ decision. So I’m not going to comment on what these rules look like or not.”

A brokered Republican convention is now more likely than ever, as the delegate math in the Republican race is beginning to narrow for front-runner Donald Trump — who may come up short of securing the 1,237 delegates needed to secure the GOP nomination.

23 Comments on Paul Ryan’s Hat is NOT in the ring – “Period. End of Story.”

  1. agree with joe6pak. Only thing driving the elites is a desire to keep the gravy train rolling. With Cruz/Trump it’s lights out. With Hillary the show goes on. No reason to think they won’t try and put in a Ryan or a Trey Gowdy type of “conservative” republican. Only question is will Ryan (or whomever they pick) be okay with being a sacrificial lamb. But I’m sure it will be a well-rewarded gig.

  2. From Cruz and Trump followers, there is fierce loyalty, but there is also (among many) the belief that the other is a construct of the globalists, or something similar. Yes, Cruz worked for Bush, but there was only ONE GOP president he might have worked for. It’s not like there was a choice. It doesn’t make them ideologically identical.

    Most of US voted for Bush, but that doesn’t mean we agree with him on everything. Reagan’s veep was Bush Sr.! The association may or may not mean anything.

    I’m more concerned about the appointment of gambler Phil Graham than the association with some in the Bush family.

    Similarly, with Trump, he made political contributions to left wingers. A lot of this I chalk up to business accommodation. Some, maybe not. I can’t be sure what he’ll do, but it’s encouraging when you hear he is having the Heritage Foundation draw up a list of SCOTUS candidates. Trump says a lot of wild things. This is his greatest asset and simultaneously his greatest liability. But I suspect he MAY be extremely good.

    I can’t be certain, but I suspect that if we get either one of these men, we’ll have done as well as we could.

Comments are closed.