Princeton bioethics professor faces calls for resignation over infanticide support – IOTW Report

Princeton bioethics professor faces calls for resignation over infanticide support

WT– Disability activists have launched a petition demanding Princeton University professor Peter Singer resign over his outspoken support for euthanasia and infanticide.

peter singer

Mr. Singer, who teaches bioethics at the private Ivy League university, has for years promoted public policy that would legalize the killing of severely disabled infants, the petition states.

On his faculty page, Mr. Singer argues: “Newborn human babies have no sense of their own existence over time. So killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living. That doesn’t mean that it is not almost always a terrible thing to do. It is, but that is because most infants are loved and cherished by their parents, and to kill an infant is usually to do a great wrong to its parents.

more

17 Comments on Princeton bioethics professor faces calls for resignation over infanticide support

  1. What constitutes a disability in his eyes? A child who grew up a boy and wanted to be a girl? Or someone born gay in a Muslim family? Or born a poor black child like Navin R. Johnson (The Jerk)? Or grew up a conservative in a douche bag liberal family? Maybe a smug ass professor named after a liberal-activist A-hole?

  2. He’s been advocating this evil for many years-the fact that he’s still firmly ensconced at this shithole says all you need to know.

    Hell we have a president that sponsored a bill that would force hospitals to leave living aborted babies alone in some fucking dark closet until they finally die.

    He ain’t going no where.

    We’re going to pay for this, BIG TIME.

  3. This guy is just like my So Cal neighbors. Killing babies is no big deal to them, but they will stay up all night to try to save a half-dead bunny rabbit, and weep bitterly when it dies. Insane.

  4. Singer has a cold cruel view of the world. His bioethics teachings seem to be based on the fear of not enough caring and resources to go around. He has poverty of the spirit and it is pitiful that he is held in high esteem by Princeton University and the left. Liberal problem solving always looks to death of the innocent as an answer to life’s problems. It is chilling.

  5. almost always a terrible thing to do. It is, but that is because most infants are loved and cherished by their parents, and to kill an infant is usually to do a great wrong to its parents.

    How lovely of him to throw that in there

  6. Progtard assholes have no sense of anything outside of their own narrow marxist psychopathic lockstep existence. So bitch slapping a progtard to death is never equivalent to hurting an actual human being, that is, a being who is worth a shit. That doesn’t mean that it is not almost always a terrible thing to do. It is, but that is because objective Judeo-Christian morality makes it wrong to beat a person to death, even when they are an utterly worthless progtard shitbag.

Comments are closed.