The Atlantic says that Kate’s Law shouldn’t be enacted because it would put too many people in jail for too long a time. Too save money we should allow deported illegals to return to America without penalty, because having illegals, with their 50% welfare enrollment, is not at all a loss leader.
The Atlantic…
Where seldom is heard
A disparaging word
Because we will block you with your logical rebuttal
Maybe everyone here should attempt to post your comment under their name.
Are the going to block 50 people?
“Disparate Impact”!!!
Too many people who have broken the law will be put in jail!
We need more innocent people in jail to achieve a faaaair balance!
You made their heads hurt with that question, BFH. Manager probably got tired of everybody screaming in pain. lol
They must only like questions with already per-determined answers by the left.
I wondered that as well.
What a wonderful job to have – screening the comments section for logical rebuttals at a libtard website. They must have some strong headache medicines.
I wonder if they get a living wage?
Getting blocked from a lib rag website is the medal of Conservative Fighter for Freedom in my book.
I just feel bad for the lefties that read the Atlantic that they won’t get a chance to defend themselves or better yet come to realize what complete putzes they are for being libtards.
Kate’s Law and federal prisons, or land mines along the border.
Take your pick.
Yes, they will.
Common Sense and compassion are not prevalent in the land of the mentally ill liberals.