Sorry Feminists, Progressives and Dumbbells – Men Outperform Women in Combat – IOTW Report

Sorry Feminists, Progressives and Dumbbells – Men Outperform Women in Combat

STOP WITH YOUR STUPID EXPERIMENTATION. YOU’RE GOING TO GET PEOPLE KILLED — EVERYONE EXCEPT THE ENEMY.

The US Marines tested all-male squads against mixed-gender ones, and the results were pretty bleak

ht/ Reddecaesari

 

20 Comments on Sorry Feminists, Progressives and Dumbbells – Men Outperform Women in Combat

  1. Are there no leaders anymore who are capable of using empirical evidence and critical thinking to stop stupid actions?
    They weren’t testing a new weapon for its effectivity. The effectivity of female ground warriors has been tested.
    Hey, Pentagon, Amazons are just a myth, eh?
    You guys want to use myths to make decisions, try Helen of Troy, lots of Spartans died too.
    Lt. Gen. James N. Mattis, please, say it ain’t so.

  2. isnt it proven that men are able to carry more weight for longer distances than women, able to run further? Isn’t that an ‘established scientific fact’ and don’t libs like ‘settled science?’

    Almost as if the male of the species is intended to be the one to go out and fight.

    Of course there will be outliers, women who are far to the right on the bell curve, stronger than an ‘average’ man.

    The military operates on averages. Average height, average weight, average endurance, average strength. They know what an average soldier can do and how to extract that from him.

    The special forces takes the men who are the outliers. Many soldiers who are perfectly adequate in the infantry don’t make it through special forces training.

    Marine training is brutal, but I work with a guy who was already crazy fit before entering the marines and thought it was cake.

    My grandpa grew up on a farm and went into the army in WWII and actually put on weight during basic, it was easier than farm life.

    Of course, there is one neat trick that men can’t do. They aren’t equipped with a small factory to make more men.

  3. They don’t care about original design, it is the progressive outcomes they’re after. “Victory” to them looks like a totally neutered humanity. Because, original design- it’s just not faaaiiirrr.

  4. The ObolaBots have no intention of ever winning anything militarily. Our Armed Forces are to prance around in their new rainbow outfits sniffing each others’ asses, but forbidden to be heterosexual. Obola’s army will be the ferals holding their pistols sideways and shooting each other and whatever hapless honkies wander into their ghettos.

  5. They aren’t equipped with a small factory to make more men.

    Many governments have done studies after wars to try to find out why many people die but the population recovers quickly. After natural disasters, it takes longer.

    It was discovered that during natural disasters, women, along with the men, die. However in wars, it is usually on the men that die. There are still women around to have babies with the men that are left. In other words, these women will produce the number of babies they were likely to produce anyway.

  6. There were plenty of suitable positions for women in the military before we lost our last Commander in Chief.

    The Army already had all the data they needed when the first group of MEN were recruited into the Continental Army in 1775.

    Typical anti-American leftists wanting to just flush all the proof down the shitter and fabricate some new bullshit to replace it with.

    “Ouch, ooh, wait for me, I broke a nail!, Medic!”

  7. Instead of “Corpsman!” the cry heard on the battlefield will be “Nail Tech!”

    Or, “Give me some of those box-looking thingies with bullets that goes in my gun! No, that one’s all scratched up.”

    (Apologies to those ladies, who like my wife, can field-strip a black rifle.)

Comments are closed.