DC: CNN host Jake Tapper expressed skepticism that Michael Cohen’s Thursday guilty plea necessarily amounted to “any evidence” of a conspiracy between the Trump team and the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.
After introducing New York Rep. Jerry Nadler as “the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee” who is “expected” to become its chairman, Tapper immediately questioned the congressman about actual “evidence of conspiracy” resulting from former Trump attorney Michael Cohen’s plea deal.
“Look, this is clearly not welcome news for the president,” said Tapper. “I don’t want to pretend that it is but once again I look at these documents and I don’t see any evidence of conspiracy between members of the Trump team and the Russian government to interfere in the election.” more here
“I look at these documents and we don’t have–umm, I don’t see–any evidence of conspiracy between members of the Trump team and the Russian government to interfere in the election.”
FIFY, Jake from Deep State Farm.
Jake Tapper: he’s risking rabid ostentation by being rational. Cue the apology.
How long is CNN going to tolerate Tapper’s slide to facts?
Sure, the Dems don’t like Putin, or more accurately Putin makes a convenient foil to Trump, but they like that stype of socialist, communist, dictatorship government. Democrats aren’t even pretending anymore; they openly call themselves socialists and tell people that’s what they want.
I would think the Democrats would embrace Putin and his style. Voter fraud? Check. State controlled media? Check. State sanctioned punishment for people who disagree? Check. Keeping the proles in their place? Check. Blatant lies to the public to obtain and keep public office? Check.
If Trump were colluding with the Russians, the Democrats should think that this is good – after all, they want that style of government here.
Mea culpa and self-flagellation for heresy in 4,3,2….
Hey Mueller, where’s the meatloaf?! Um, I mean collusion?
https://youtu.be/1bMs04JK0BQ
Hey Bob, are you evidunce fairy? Let us see some evidunce!