The Left STILL Can’t Define What a Woman Is – IOTW Report

The Left STILL Can’t Define What a Woman Is

Matt Walsh, exasperated, listens to a bunch of morons and sets them straight.

The thing that kills me is that these assholes, if you asked them 5 years ago to define what a woman is, would just give you the accurate definition. No questions asked.

But they have learned through observation what makes a dutiful little leftist, and they gladly make idiots out of themselves as they bend themselves into a pretzel in order to resist the factual definition.

WHY?

Because they are useful idiots.

It is IMPOSSIBLE for the entirety of the left to have come to this conclusion, all on their own, all at the same time, that there is no definition of what a woman is.

They argue this point, unashamedly, when they know damn well they do not believe what they are saying, they say it in order to be good little minions.

It’s embarrassing.

13 Comments on The Left STILL Can’t Define What a Woman Is

  1. They know what it is. They must pretend not to know. This is the hallmark of the Leftist’s devotion to their Cult-Worldview.

    “A woman is an adult, human female.”

    The definition makes a distinction and states objective truth. The Leftist understands that if they accept this definition, then trans-men can no longer “really be women.” When the question is asked, you can see the mental gymnastics taking place, the dissonance and distress that such a simple question is causing them. To accept objective truth is to repudiate Leftism at its very core and makes one a “bigot” who is guilty of “hate speech.”

    7
  2. They may not know what a woman is, but they sure know how to destroy them! Could be cuz most of ’em are nasty, ugly and jealous of real beauty and ability!

    5
  3. There is no limit to the indignities followers of the cult of progressivism willingly and knowingly accept in order to demonstrate their dedication to progressive idealism. Most of them are shit for brains, and none of them have any self respect. They all are motivated by a compulsive need to be seen by others as in with the in crowd.

    They have of their own volition forfeited any legitimate claim they might have to respect on that basis alone.

    3
  4. It rained last night so, of course, we lost internet and it still hasn’t come back. because of that I am using data and the video does not come up (probably because everyone in the neighborhood is using data) so I don’t know if this was covered in the video or not:

    I recently saw a video where an ARCHEOLOGIST said they can’t tell whether ancient skeletons they find are mail or female.

    1
  5. I am just fine with liberals claiming they don’t know what a woman is – in fact, I think we should adopt this as the national standard. Think of the advantages:

    – Is there a pay gap? Nope, because we don’t know what a woman is, so there can’t be a pay gap between men and something that can’t be defined.
    – We can’t have discrimination in employment. How can you discriminate against something that is undefined?
    – “Reproductive health” would be simplified, and basically distilled to prostate exams and prescriptions for Viagra since we should only concentrate on the one gender that can be defined.
    – Carl’s Jr. can go back to commercials with bikini clad somethings eating cheese burgers because women (whatever that is) aren’t being sexualized.
    – I don’t pay for dinner for chairs, monster trucks or video games so I don’t have to pay for dinner for something I can’ even define.

    I would go even further than these liberal loons – I would eradicate any definition of “woman” and return to the Middle Ages were only “men” counted. And since the feudal system was essentially based on “strong, stronger and strongest,” men should have a leg up on the “others” who biologically aren’t as physically strong.

    5

Comments are closed.