The Story of the Convenience Store Owner Whose Life Is In Ruins For Shooting Dindu Nuffin With Long Rap Sheet – IOTW Report

The Story of the Convenience Store Owner Whose Life Is In Ruins For Shooting Dindu Nuffin With Long Rap Sheet

This shopkeeper will most likely go to prison, and it’s because his straight and narrow and conservative work ethic crossed paths with the spawn of progressivism.

Watch this. It’s heartbreaking.

26 Comments on The Story of the Convenience Store Owner Whose Life Is In Ruins For Shooting Dindu Nuffin With Long Rap Sheet

  1. What the defense should shoot for is “Jury nullification”.

    If the defense can just get the wrap sheet of the deceased some who admitted. Then in closing just say something like “if the state would spend their time putting kidnappers in prison then Mr. Kym would not have been accused by the POS in the fist place. But, here we are today because an impotent D.A. feels the need to punish the innocent. Look, I’ll put it this way for any low information voter in the jury pool- a thug who kidnaps children and bully the law abiding is DEAD… even Forrest Gump could see there is no downside to this equation. Oh, and my client has PTSD because of all the crime he has to deal with because the D.A. is a joke when it comes to real criminal breaking real crimes and it seems the only time the D.A. can manage to get busy is when a victim of crime stands up for himself.”

    Oh what I would not give to be on that jury.

  2. Several lessons here:
    1. Don’t own or work in a store in a Black neighborhood. I don’t care it they have to take a bus to buy food. or make black people invest their own money in such places and take the risks of being around such people.
    2. You cannot shoot at a guy who is fleeing the scene. He has obviously been coached about saying the magic words, “I was in fear for my life”. But that won’t help him in this case. He should have paid the $85 for the class that would have told him this.
    3. Get good quality security cameras. If you shoot someone in the back, make sure you erase the tapes before the police get there.
    4. If you shoot someone, the police are NOT your friends. Tell them nothing. Don’t give them access to your security system tapes without a warrant. make them figure out for themselves what happened and who is at fault. In the absence of witnesses or video, it’s just another unsolved case.

  3. The cop never says that Dindu didn’t attack the clerk, just that “at no time did he go for the gun.”
    What constitutes self defense in the Pacific northwest is night and day different than it is anywhere else, I suspect.

  4. I feel for the guy. I didn’t watch the entire video and the nubian is obviously a scumbag who fucking deserved what he got but if there was no struggle and he was shot in the back, the shop keeper is going to prison.

    It’s like people that shoot at someone stealing their car and kill them, the threat of being in fear for your life has passed, you can’t use deadly force.

    The worst part is the scumbag has a bunch of friends in prison and this guy is a walking bullseye.

  5. It will probably get pled down to voluntary manslaughter.
    It is hard to defend shooting someone in the back, and it shouldn’t be done, no matter how mad you are or what a scumbag the perp is.
    Having a firearm requires that one be lucid, thinking and in control of their emotions. Anyone who can’t do that should just leave the gun in a drawer.

  6. The defense for shooting someone in the back is, “he was facing me aggressively when I pulled the trigger but turned suddenly as I fired twice. Because he turned, I didn’t shoot him 4 times.”

    But with video showing otherwise, his goose is cooked. he needs to keep his mouth shut and stay off TV. He also needs to sell that store. His family or employees will never be safe there again.

  7. Criminals aren’t just “robbing a store.”
    Criminals are undermining society.
    Criminals are thwarting the law and, piece by piece, destroying civilization.
    One should not, just by turning his back, become invulnerable to the consequences of his actions.

    izlamo delenda est …

  8. @JohnS:

    … It is hard to defend shooting someone in the back, and it shouldn’t be done, no matter how mad you are or what a scumbag the perp is. …

    Yes, this is true. Even the SCOTUS has ruled this way. So why are cops walking away free as birds when they shoot and kill suspects who are only running away and posing no threat?

    [This is of course a rhetorical question, and not really directed at you, JohnS.]

  9. I agree with you Uncle AL.
    There are bad apples in every profession, and cops are no exception.
    Letting some of those bad apples get away with murder has a corrosive effect on the publics opinion of what are, for the most part, admirable people.

  10. If some low life piece of crap is running away from me, while in the possession of my stuff, and I have a gun ready to fire I’m likely to take the shot. I’ll aim for his knee but if I hit him center mass…….oh well.

  11. @JohnS – The “bad apple” analogy is sure thought provoking. I learned that it meant that one bad apple makes all the other apples in the barrel go bad. When we are talking about cops, what does that tell us? I take it to mean that apples that, left on their own wouldn’t go bad, are likely to go bad if the original bad ones aren’t identified and thrown out as soon as possible.

    When you look at most enforcer agencies, that is very, very much NOT happening.

  12. So in WA, an armed robber (with long rap sheet) WITH A GUN IN HIS HAND, is shot in the back by his intended victim, and the intended victim is arrested and being prosecuted for murder. Meanwhile, a few months earlier, and a few hundred miles south, LeVoy Finnicum (no criminal record), with NO GUN IN HIS HAND, is shot 3 times IN THE BACK, and it is ruled “justified”. We are living in bizzaro world, where all the cops are criminals, and all the sinners saints.

Comments are closed.