WaPo Editor: Bragg’s Case is ‘Unnervingly Flimsy’ – IOTW Report

WaPo Editor: Bragg’s Case is ‘Unnervingly Flimsy’

WaPo Editor: Bragg’s Case Against Trump is ‘Disturbingly Unilluminating’ and ‘Unnervingly Flimsy.’

National Pulse:

Washington Post associate editor and columnist Ruth Marcus took to the pages of the Bezos-owned paper Wednesday morning to decry Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against Donald J. Trump as weak, calling it a “dangerous leap on the highest of wires.”

Describing Bragg’s case as “disturbingly unilluminating, and the theory on which it rests is debatable at best, unnervingly flimsy at worst,” Marcus, a Yale and Harvard Law School graduate, said in her scathing op-ed:

I’m not saying prosecutors will lose this case. They could well win, and I hope they do, because a failure to secure a conviction will only inflame Trump and his supporters in their claims that the criminal justice system is being weaponized against them. But the fears I had in the weeks leading up to the indictment about the strength of the case against Trump were in no way allayed by Tuesday’s developments. MORE

12 Comments on WaPo Editor: Bragg’s Case is ‘Unnervingly Flimsy’

  1. Calling Bragg’s case “flimsy” is like calling a life-size replica of the Eiffel Tower made entirely out of cooked spaghetti “flimsy”.

    Of course, the degree of adherence to the law and respect for constitutional rights by NYC judges and juries is similarly “flimsy”.

  2. If you expect justice out of the NY Court system, you’re a fool.
    NY Courts are decidedly more corrupt than even CA’s and IL’s.
    And have been for more than a century.

    mortem tyrannis
    izlamo delenda est …

  3. Alvin Bragg is ChinaMoney Joe Biden’s new bribed ‘uncle’ on the Biden Family White Privilege Plantation. Still, Bragg himself is not ‘above the law’ as he squawks about everyone else.


Comments are closed.