Woman Goes Berserk Over General Lee Car – IOTW Report

Woman Goes Berserk Over General Lee Car

Sunday, 25 June 2017, 15:20 BFH Uncategorized 33

“I want the car gone.”

She has all the talking points down cold, including “white privilege!!!”

She demanded the car be gone within an hour or she would instigate a furious letter writing campaign in concert with all her SJW comrades on social media.

I demand all references to #BLM be wiped out within an hour because #BLM has killed cops and burned and destroyed cities. I’m triggered, and that’s all that matters.

More at TruePundit

ht/ annie

33 Comments on Woman Goes Berserk Over General Lee Car

  7. Irish were brought as slaves, Jews, Irish, Italians, gays, debtors were also hung. Where did the idea that Blacks were the only victims come from? Democrats. The same assholes who were anti black. And by the way, there WERE black slave owners, too. Just sayin’.
    The confederate flag and the America flag was flying at the same time at one point. So what? She wants both flags banned now?
    The confederate flag stood for both good and evil at that time in history.
    This whole thing is just her attention whoring and her drooling hysteria. It means nothing.

  14. People have too much free time. If they are hungry they go to a restaurant.
    Clothing you go to a store and buy it.
    Back in the day people had to make their own clothes or forage for their dinner.
    They have nothing to do but bitch about the world they live in.

  17. Someone should create a campaign to tear down the Pyramids at Giza the Coliseum in Rome and the Parthenon in Greece as evidence exists proving they were partially or wholly built with slave labor!
    Most Confederate soldiers never owned a single slave even if they wanted to slaves were very expensive and beyond the reach of most Confederate soldiers. If all the South wanted was slavery they should have just stayed in the Union as Lincoln certainly wasn’t going to try to abolish slavery where it already existed no way. No the real rub was The South wanted to leave they fought for Independence like their Grandfathers did from King George. All my military age ancestors fought for the CSA most but not all under General Lee in the Army of Northern Virginia. Todays PC Lib Prog Puke DemocRAT Traitors Party and their Lapdog Media don’t care for history they view everything thru 2017 PC Lib Prog Puke tinted glasses. History should be studied and appreciated in the time period it occurred to do otherwise is just plain doing it wrong………….SPIT!

  20. I wish she’d had a stroke. I would have walked on and over her just to get to someplace else. How many people would have called the Kanuck version of 9-1-1 for her?

  26. Me. It’s all about me. I want this, I want that, and I want it now. Me, me, me. It’s a replica of a car from a television show – it’s not a statement about anything, and in fact the television show itself wasn’t a statement about anything except selling deordorant and soft drinks.

  28. Tell the woman to go to Melrose Plantation in North Louisiana. National park honoring black plantation owners that had high slave population. The only flag that took people from Africa and brought them to the main slavery hub, which was New York was the stars and stripes. When Lincoln freed the slaves, he did not do so in the north. I have seen many a clan meeting and never saw the stars and bars, always the stars and stripes, headquarters were across from where I lived.

  29. In Tacoma we live in a community in which in 2017 black students must make the Hobbesian choice of attending public school in an institution named in honor of one of the most, if not the most, virulent racists and segregationists ever to hold the office of President of the United States or not attend public school their neighborhood.

    In fact I have emailed The News Tribune and pointed out what a scandal and a disgrace it is for any black child to have to make that choice. Furthermore I have emailed each and every one of your City Council members and the Mayor and the Tacoma School District and I as much as spelled out what the legacy of Woodrow Wilson is with regard to racial discrimination and I have pointed out to all of the above that Wilson was absolutely and unequivocally personally responsible, along with his Administration, for REsegregating a federal workforce that had been largely desegregated by his predecessors.

    None of the above even took the time to acknowledge the receipt of my correspondences. INCLUDING I MIGHT ADD, your City Council members and your Mayor who are only too eager to take advantage of each and every opportunity to posture about and preen their phony-baloney feathers while talking down to and casting aspersions on the “unwashed masses” who go about their daily lives not bothering anyone.

    Ignorance may have been an excuse, but at the point that I brought Woodrow Wilson’s record on race and segregation to the attention of the people we have trusted to be Tacoma’s leaders and stewards of the Tacoma School District any claim of lack of knowledge on their part has, from that point on, been too convenient. It is what is referred to as “willful ignorance.”
    Willful ignorance excuses nothing and actually implicates those who would seek refuge therein with a degree of sympathy for Wilson’s racist and segregationist policies. Does it not? And if not, why not? If after learning about what Wilson’s Administration was responsible for on this front one comes away believing that having his name on a public school building is still acceptable… who, prey tell, would be disqualified by virtue of their actions from being so honored?

    My inclination is that Wilson’s standing as a progressive movement icon is what insulates him from any criticism from the Tacoma/Pierce County political machine (which includes the school board). That being said, this is not about what the makeup of the school board or the makeup of the political power structure is in Tcoma and Pierce County, it is about doing what is right and to retain this man’s name in a place of honor on any public school building is flat out demeaning to black students who attend school therein and an insult to their families.

    In case you are not aware of the record of Woodrow Wilson when it comes to racial segregation let’s start with this:

    Mr. Monroe Trotter: Mr. President, we are here to renew our protest against the segregation of colored employees in the departments of our National Government. We [had] appealed to you to undo this race segregation in accord with your duty as President and with your pre-election pledges to colored American voters. We stated that such segregation was a public humiliation and degradation, and entirely unmerited and far-reaching in its injurious effects. . . .

    President Woodrow Wilson: The white people of the country, as well as I, wish to see the colored people progress, and admire the progress they have already made, and want to see them continue along independent lines. There is, however, a great prejudice against colored people. . . . It will take one hundred years to eradicate this prejudice, and we must deal with it as practical men. Segregation is not humiliating, but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen. If your organization goes out and tells the colored people of the country that it is a humiliation, they will so regard it, but if you do not tell them so, and regard it rather as a benefit, they will regard it the same. The only harm that will come will be if you cause them to think it is a humiliation.

    Mr. Monroe Trotter. It is not in accord with the known facts to claim that the segregation was started because of race friction of white and colored [federal] clerks. The indisputable facts of the situation will not permit of the claim that the segregation is due to the friction. It is untenable, in view of the established facts, to maintain that the segregation is simply to avoid race friction, for the simple reason that for fifty years white and colored clerks have been working together in peace and harmony and friendliness, doing so even through two [President Grover Cleveland] Democratic administrations. Soon after your inauguration began, segregation was drastically introduced in the Treasury and Postal departments by your appointees.

    President Woodrow Wilson. If this organization is ever to have another hearing before me it must have another spokesman. Your manner offends me. . . . Your tone, with its background of passion.

    Mr. Monroe Trotter. But I have no passion in me, Mr. President, you are entirely mistaken; you misinterpret my earnestness for passion.

    AND

    President Wilson’s initial policy measures were so stridently anti-black, Du Bois felt obliged to write “Another Open Letter to Woodrow Wilson” in September 1913. Du Bois was blunt, writing that “[I]t is no exaggeration to say that every enemy of the Negro race is greatly encouraged; that every man who dreams of making the Negro race a group of menials and pariahs is alert and hopeful.” Listing the most notorious racists of the era, including “Pitchfork” Ben Tillman,** Du Bois wrote that they were undoubtedly encouraged since “not a single act” or “a single word” from Wilson “has given anyone reason” to believe that he will act positively with respect to African Americans citing the removal of several black appointees from office and the appointment of a single black whom was “such a contemptible cur, that his very nomination was an insult to every Negro in the land.” Altogether the segregationist and discriminatory policies of Wilson in his first six months alone were judged by Du Bois to be the “gravest attack on the liberties” of African Americans since Emancipation.

    In a tone that was almost threatening Du Bois wrote the president that there exist “foolish people who think that such policy has no limit and that lynching “Jim Crowism,” segregation and insult are to be permanent institutions in America.” Pointing to the segregation in the Treasury and Post Office Departments Du Bois wrote Wilson of the “colored clerks [that] have been herded to themselves as though they were not human beings” and of the one clerk “who could not actually be segregated on account of the nature of his work” who, therefore, “had a cage built around him to separate him from his white companions of many years,” he asked President Wilson a long series of questions. “Mr. Wilson, do you know these things? Are you responsible for them? Did you advise them? Do you know that no other group of American citizens has ever been treated in this way and that no President of the United States ever dared to propose such treatment?” Like Trotter later Du Bois ends by threatening Wilson with the complete loss of black votes for any of his future electoral quests or that of his Democratic Party. Du Bois relied on questions to hammer home his point. “1. Do you want Negro votes? 2. Do you think that ‘Jim Crow’ civil service will get these votes? 3. Is your Negro policy to be dictated by Tillman and Vardaman? . . . “

    “Segregation is not humiliating, but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen.”–Woodrow Wilson

    OK, If you want to know how I learned of Wilson’s despicable legacy I was perusing a selection of biographies and came across this book

    The Guardian of Boston: William Monroe Trotter

    Reading that book and further independent research into Woodrow Wilson’s Administration, particularly with regard to resegregating what had been a desegregated federal Civil Service and US Military made me sick. I live right down the street from Woodrow Wilson High School and hundreds of black high school students must sit in a building named in honor of this man if they wish to take advantage of their right to public education. This is not just wrong, it is obscene.

    Educate yourself and if you don’t agree with me that this man’s name has no business anywhere near a place of honor in public education you are certainly entitled to your opinion. But you and I will never agree on that.

    While President of Princeton, Wilson made sure to avoid admitting black students to Princeton’s undergraduate program. When a black man from South Carolina wrote of his desire to attend Princeton, Wilson wrote back and “politely” informed him that blacks were not welcome at his school, though also suggesting that he apply to Princeton’s Theological Seminary, an institution separate from the main university.

    In his writings, Wilson eulogized the antebellum South and lamented the period of reconstruction that followed the Civil War. To quote Wilson himself on this subject, “self-preservation [forced whites] to rid themselves, by fair means or foul, of the intolerable burden of governments sustained by the votes of ignorant negroes.”

    and

    “The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self-preservation—until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the Southern country.”

    and

    “Segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen.”

    and

    Speaking to protesters of segregated battalions, Wilson’s patronizing words reflect the progressive mentality that government must tell the people how to regard the issues. The protest of the people is just loud ignorance. The military wasn’t desegregated until 1948. Certainly, Wilson set equality back during his presidency and earlier accomplishments for desegregation might have been made if it weren’t for Wilson’s championing it as a benefit to be cherished.

    and

    “[Reconstruction government was detested] not because the Republican Party was dreaded but because the dominance of an ignorant and inferior race was justly dreaded.”

    and

    “Off by themselves with only a white supervisor, blacks would not be forced out of their jobs by energetic white employees.”

    and

    “The whole temper and tradition of the place [Princeton] are such that no Negro has ever applied for admission, and it seems unlikely that the question will ever assume practical form.”

    and

    As President of Princeton, long before he became President of the United States, Wilson actively discouraged black people from applying to the University.

    “Any man who carries a hyphen about with him carries a dagger that he is ready to plunge into the vitals of this Republic whenever he gets ready.”
    Distrust of anyone not originally from the US was encouraged by this progressive icon.

    and

    “In the matter of Chinese and Japanese coolie immigration, I stand for the national policy of exclusion. We cannot make a homogenous population out of people who do not blend with the Caucasian race… Oriental Coolieism will give us another race problem to solve and surely we have had our lesson.”

    Wilson’s racism extended not only to a perceived “race problem” in the US, but the potential of more of them by the immigration of Asians.

    “Now came multitudes of men of the lowest class from the south of Italy, and men of the meaner sort out of Hungary and Poland, men out of the ranks, where there was neither skill nor energy nor any initiative of quick intelligence, and they came in numbers which increased from year to year, as if the countries of the south of Europe were disburdening themselves of the more sordid and hapless elements of their population.”

    Wilson’s words attacked the core of our founding principles. Of course the Constitution must change as a living document for Wilson, because in his assessment the constitution was wrong.

  30. And the local paper of record, who tries to exploit every thug that gets himself capped, will not print this because Woodrow Wilson was a PROGRESSIVE. I have been trying, to no avail for well over a decade.

  31. Canada brings in muslims from countries who own and sell slaves in Africa and the middle east right now. And they bring that lifestyle and mentality to Canada daily.
    Why isn’t she marching up and spewing her rage hormones all over Trudeau about it?

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.