Clinton Campaign Funneled $150,000 To Hillary Clinton’s Personal Company

DC: Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has transferred nearly $150,000 of leftover campaign funds to a company she solely owns in the months following her election defeat, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

The Clinton campaign has paid $149,457 to ZFS Holdings LLC, since May 2017 for the purpose of “rent,” FEC filings show, but the campaign has left it unclear if it’s paying at, above or below fair market value for the office space it’s renting.

Also, the rent payments to ZFS were sent to the same address as Rorrie Gregorio, Clinton’s personal financial manager.

“Obviously, it has a certain fishiness to it,” former FEC chairman and founder of the Institute for Free Speech Brad Smith told The Daily Caller News Foundation about the rent payments.

If ZFS is undercharging the Clinton campaign for rent, it could “constitute something of value to the committee and would thus be an in-kind contribution,” according to a 1995 FEC ruling. But if ZFS is overcharging the campaign, it could mean campaign funds are going to the company Clinton solely owns.  more here

11 Comments on Clinton Campaign Funneled $150,000 To Hillary Clinton’s Personal Company

  1. Perhaps the Real Estate tycoon will sum this up later in a tweet.

    And speaking of porn names…Rorrie Gregorio?




    2
  2. “…the campaign has left it unclear if it’s paying at, above or below fair market value for the office space it’s renting.”

    Low rent, for sure.




    2
  3. Hillary is probably charging her campaign “rent” on either a non-existent address, or a piece of property that she does not even own. It’s probably someone’s plot in a cemetery.




    6
  4. what a surprise. I would have never thought hellery would stoop to just picking up a mere 150K. I guess times are tough for the poor broke Clintons.




    4
  5. Why won’t anyone investigate payments made to the Clintons during her time as Secretary of State? Surely there’s got to be some collusion there.




    0
  6. I’m not going to believe this until Huma Danger admits that it was her husband’s fault. Carlos Danger is still running things. That’s the only explanation for all these innocent, honest mistakes.




    1
  7. When referencing anything to do with the clintons, “Obviously, it has a certain fishiness to it,” has got to be the understatement of the decade.




    2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!