” End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP finally can contest vote fraud after 36 years” – IOTW Report

” End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP finally can contest vote fraud after 36 years”

Remember this from just a few months ago?

Investment watch blog: Just in time for this November’s mid-term elections!

Did you know that since 1982, the Republican Party had been legally prohibited from contesting elections due to suspected vote fraud, because of a legal agreement called the Consent Decree the GOP made with the Democrat Party?

Finally, 36 years later, a judge has ended the agreement, freeing the Republican Party to ensure electoral integrity by investigating and pursuing suspected vote fraud.

Betcha you never heard or seen this truly momentous news in the Left-infested mainstream nedia. Why’s that?


As I explained in my post of November 15, 2012, “Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud,” in 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the Republican National Committee (RNC), the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).

The lawsuit alleged that:

  • The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
  • The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
  • The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.

To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance.

The two parties agreed that “in the future, in all states and territories of the United States,” they would:

(d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or tointerrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;

(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;

(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.

The RNC also agreed that the RNC, its agents, servants, and employees would be bound by the Decree, “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.”

To put it bluntly, the Consent Decree in effect gave a carte blanche to the Democrat Party to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America that has, in the language of the Consent Decree, “a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations.” The term “substantial proportion” is not defined.

In 1987, the Consent Decree was modified to define “ballot security activities” as “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”

Since 1982, the Consent Decree had been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, who, even after he retired, returned every year for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year. Debevoise died in August 2015.  Keep Reading

h/t G. Combs.

14 Comments on ” End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP finally can contest vote fraud after 36 years”

  1. It will be interesting to see if they actually do anything now. I doubt it.

  2. Better late than never but why are finding out about this now? We could have been working to overturn this treasonous agreement years ago.

  3. Anonymous- Too many pussy republicans. That’s why they waited til it expired.
    Actually, I’m pissed off at Reagan for allowing this in the first place. They gave them everything over allegations. Globalist pussy republicans back then, too.

  4. This is unbelievable! It’s a good thing McCain, Flake and Corker are gone, they would petition the court to keep it in place.

  5. Anon, you obviously haven’t been paying attention, many have written about it numerous times over the years.
    There was really a lot written and said about it during Bush V Gore.

    CTH had a couple of posts about it during the Obama years.

    I didn’t know it had ended though. Now will they start exposing the fraud?

  6. The (D)irtbag party is destroying the very idea of democracy with their frauds and thievery. Damn them to hell.

    What kind of country fails to demand basic election security such as described in this article?

    This is one of those things which should be mentioned by every (R) politician at every debate – another would be to demand the (D)irtbag side to defend their position on voter ID. People can recognize evil – as long as it’s not hidden by the media/ (D)irtbag/ education/ legal industry/ bureaucrat coalition.

  7. Are there any more pieces of shit ‘contracts’ hidden from us?

  8. Yea, I knew about it.

    Couldn’t believe it when I first heard about it when a commenter wrote it at American Thinker a few years back. I looked it up, sure enough there it was. I copied the government website I found it on and bookmarked it. Used it many times in discussions with numbskulls.

    Good to know it’s finally dead.

    BTW… The link in the article is a dead link. Here’s a better one. https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/tag/1982-rnc-dnc-consent-decree

  9. What a joke that was. Not go after fraud? It shouldn’t even be their call in the first place.

  10. “Free at last, free at last – thank God Almighty, we’re free at last!”


  11. What is this nonsense? the story says this judge came out of retirement every year, EVERY YEAR? to renew his court order. WHAT? the guys retired, he’s no longer a judge, no longer an employee, he’s no longer in the service of the federal government in retirement. how can this be?

  12. Riiiiiight … and the DoJ, the FBI, the FEC, the states’ Attorneys General couldn’t go after voter fraud?

    I smell BULLSHIT!

    izlamo delenda est …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.