UK Daily Mail
Dozens of court documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein‘s associates, including a billionaire businessman, will be made public after a judge ruled the public interest outweighs the right to privacy.
Judge Loretta Preska on Friday ruled that the material concerning eight people should be unsealed despite one subject claiming it could ‘wrongfully harm (his) privacy and reputation.’ More
I’M SURE THE LEFT ISN’T WORRIED ABOUT THIS, RIGHT????
BUNCH OF PEEVERTS
WINNING!!
So people who commit felonious child exploitation are entitled to privacy now?
But the same people who demand that demand to see Trumps tax returns?
EIGHT!!
Eight sacraficial lambs.
There is probably 50 from Hollyweird.
Another 50 from congress.
Epstein and Weinstein, partners or competitors?
At least 183 “Does” in Epstein’s pedo group….
and they’re going to release the names….
of 8….just 8….?
Modern American ”just us.”
The one subject that doesn’t want this material unsealed claiming it could wrongfully harm (his) privacy and reputation is CLINTON.
It will be eight redactions, followed by the name “TRUMP” in Sharpie in Nancy Pelosi’s drunken handwriting…
I don’t think I can bear another bombshell!
Hey, perverts! Your reputation is what you make it.
Cmn¢¢guy – and dozens from the corporate world. We need Ghislaine Maxwell’s list.
This should be the biggest scandal in recent history. Not only that so many powerful people are such shiiteheads, and that they are in power and telling us what to do, but that it has been covered up.
I, like most of us, would love to see every damned one of the bastards burned by this. Alas, it will probably never be known who is really on the list. But, we can all make educated guesses. Isn’t that right, Joe, Hunter, Bill, Hillary?
I just hope Mitch McConnell is one of the eight.