This wasn’t a “hook up,” or a one night stand. This was a relationship that was ongoing. They were girlfriend and boyfriend.
This is ridiculous.
Reason-
On October 23, they went to the movies together. Afterward, they kissed and engaged in consensual sexual behavior. They did so the following evening as well. These were not drunken hookups: these were mutually-agreed upon encounters, according to the details in the lawsuit.
At one point, Neal expressed concerns about giving Doe a hickey—a kiss mark on her neck—because the other trainers might notice it. Doe encouraged him to do so anyway, and promised to wear a hoodie the next day. These and other anecdotes demonstrate Doe’s full complicity in the sexual activity that took place, though her statements are even more definitive.
The hickey was indeed noticed by another trainer, described as the “Complainant” in the lawsuit. When confronted, Doe confessed to the Complainant that she and Dean had engaged in sex. According to the lawsuit, the Complainant “presumed” this sex was nonconsensual, and reported it to the director of the athletic training program.
Later, when Doe found out, she gave Neal the bad news, and texted him the following messages:
“One of the other Athletic Training students screwed me over!…She went behind my back and told my AT advisor stuff that wasn’t true!!! I’m trying so hard to fix it all.”
Neal and Doe met in person to discuss the situation. Without Doe’s knowledge, Neal recorded their conversation. This audio recording further establishes that their sex was consensual. While in Neal’s presence, Doe fielded a phone call from a coordinator of the athletic training program and stated “I’m fine and I wasn’t raped.” She then called her mother and told her the same thing.
Both Doe and her mother pressed the administrators of the athletic training program—a husband and wife team—to drop the matter, but it was too late: they had already informed the Title IX office.
To be clear, CSUP apparently believes that Title IX requires the university to investigate a student for sexual misconduct, even when his alleged victim resolutely insists that he is innocent and does not want the issue investigated. Administrators essentially treated Doe like an object that belonged to them—one that no one else was allowed to touch.
Neal and Doe, it should be noted, had consensual sex again—probably because they genuinely liked and were interested in each other, despite the university’s herculean efforts to keep them from touching each other.
Doe told another administrator, “Our stories are the same and he’s a good guy. He’s not a rapist, he’s not a criminal, it’s not even worth any of this hoopla!”
Read the idiocy HERE
Full circle. Progressives acting like puritans. How about a virginity test before marriage or no dowry? Missionary position only. They wil inspect the sheets after the wedding night.
And yet authority figures can’t understand why no one will trust them.
keep reading, it’ll turn out that USA should legalize drugs
I read the linked article, and the woman was not wearing a burqa. And she was working at a university, and as a student presumably knows how to read and write. By the way, what was she doing out in public with a male who was not her father or brother?
This is outrageous, and cannot be tolerated at a public university. True, the male student needs to be punished – a slight admonishment would be more in order than a suspension – but the female needs to be stoned, and not in a way usual in Colorado.
Dammit, we are trying to be progressive liberals here – driving America back to the stone age.
Title IX strikes again! Earlier today I read that a Federal court decided that in order to comply with Title IX, a high school had to allow individuals to use whatever bathroom they felt like identifying with. To do otherwise, including offering these individuals their own facilities, was not the equal access guaranteed by Title IX.
Our son will never, ever step foot on a college campus in this toxic environment. Most Universities mandate that an American student surrender Constitutional freedoms to the Administration through policies, rules, guidelines, etc.