NYT: Germany Should Close Borders, Conduct Mass Deportations, AND Merkel Must Resign – IOTW Report

NYT: Germany Should Close Borders, Conduct Mass Deportations, AND Merkel Must Resign

merkel beer

Breitbart- 

From the New York Times:

ON New Year’s Eve, in the shadow of Cologne’s cathedral, crowds of North African and Middle Eastern men accosted women out for the night’s festivities. They surrounded them, groped them, robbed them. Two women were reportedly raped.

Though there were similar incidents from Hamburg to Helsinki, the authorities at first played down the assaults, lest they prove inconvenient for Angela Merkel’s policy of mass asylum for refugees.

That delay has now cost Cologne’s police chief his job. But the German government still seems more concerned about policing restless natives — most recently through a deal with Facebook and Google to restrict anti-immigrant postings — than with policing migration. Just last week Merkel rejected a proposal to cap refugee admissions (which topped one million last year) at 200,000 in 2016.  MORE

13 Comments on NYT: Germany Should Close Borders, Conduct Mass Deportations, AND Merkel Must Resign

  1. Sneak Merkel in among the deportees, and let her resign from outside the country. She could send in her resignation from the guest room at the new luxury Obama house in Dubai.

  2. …meanwhile in the United States Imperator Barackus Obamacus keeps importing ‘Syrian refugees’ by the droves, to balance out his releasing of Club Gitmo ‘detainees’…

  3. BHO isn’t an Imperator in the Roman meaning of the word. I think you meant emperor sarcasticly.

    Putting that ancient title and BHO in the same sentence makes me want to puke. He has neither courage, leadership, military experience, nor any military victories. He is the antithesis of an Imperator.

  4. You are thinking of only the original meaning of the word. Here’s the OED entry for your consideration.

    In Roman History, a word originally meaning ‘commander’, under the Republic, conferred by salutation of the soldiers on a victorious general; afterwards, under the Empire, confined to the head of the state, in whose name all victories were won, and thus the equivalent of its English representative, emperor, q.v.
       From the ancient Roman Emperors, it was continued as the Latin title of the Emperors of the East and West, and so of all monarchs who claimed ‘imperial’ rank or position. In this sense it was commonly assumed (in Latin documents) by the Old English kings from Æthelstan onward…

Comments are closed.