Port Efficiency Survey – IOTW Report

Port Efficiency Survey

This is interesting – an annual survey of port efficiency. In light of the new port workers’ strike on East Coast it’s worth looking at. Table E.1 starts around page 11.

Note that the first American port on the list is at #53, Charleston (my town!) Curiously, my neighbor Savannah is nearly at the bottom.

Also close to the bottom: Tacoma, Oakland, Long Beach, Los Angeles.

Imagine how powerful a stimulant to the economy an efficient port would be. Looks like we need a change from the current structure. – Left Coast Dan

https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099060324114539683/pdf/P17583313892300871be641a5ea7b90e0e6.pdf

6 Comments on Port Efficiency Survey

  1. Union protected jobs are not designed for efficiency, they are designed for security, the security of the worker.

    When you are paid by the hour, unloading one container or a hundred, it is all the same.

    The average dock worker was making 6 figures before the strike, now it is settled, with the workers getting a 62% raise.

    9
  2. Don’t even get me started

    We imported lead shot from Peru and could put 20 tons in a container

    80 25lb bags to a ton

    We paid about $20/bag and sold for $25 so $400/ton or $8K and moved it all by hand

    If the customs wanted to open the container we had to pay for a longshoreman to cut the seal. But since the value was over something like $2,000 there had to be a second one to make sure the first one wasn’t stealing anything. Then since there was more than one, we had to pay for a lead man. The bill came to north of $600

    That was nearly 10% of what we were making on the shipment BEFORE you take out all of the other expenses.

    It’s a fucking racket

    5

Comments are closed.