SCOTUS Deciding Whether to Hear Case Suing the Oath Breakers of 2020 – IOTW Report

SCOTUS Deciding Whether to Hear Case Suing the Oath Breakers of 2020

Stone Kingdom Ministries

Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al., (Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)

Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other. The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court.

The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Docket #22-380, where 9 Justices in conference will vote (only 4 needed) to move to a hearing.

THE LAWSUIT

Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.

BOTH LAWSUITS ARE ABOUT THE DEFENDANTS BREAKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE More

Other issues in this case SCOTUS should resolved Here


7 Comments on SCOTUS Deciding Whether to Hear Case Suing the Oath Breakers of 2020

  1. Geeze. You guys still don’t get it.

    *clears throat*

    NO STANDING!

    (goes en camera to rape the child his Chinese masters reward his service with)

    10
  2. I’m surprised they took the case.

    If they were logic-based life forms, Biden and his pals would lose more than their office or their ill gotten wealth.

    Being low-life slugs however, they likely took the case in order to completely snuff out any question whatsoever that any election was rigged, or that any election in the future could be rigged.

    Here’s hoping that I’m wrong!

    4
  3. The SC is deliberating on how to word its rejection of this petition. There is no way that they will allow this to go any further. Since they are the court of last resort, they will drive the final nail into the coffin of election integrity.

    IMHO

    3
  4. The Federal government should also be prosecuted for spreading disinformation about what motivates their behavior. They’re still printing our money with “In God We Trust” on it.

    3
  5. …will failed Jeopardy question, maybe-woman, and definitely Black ‘supreme court justice’ Ketanji Onyika Brown Jackson be required to recuse her(?) self since overturning the fraudulent installation of Pedo would ALSO void her Affirmative Action appointment?

    …asking for a nation that’s sick of their shit…

  6. Nowut Ameen
    DECEMBER 1, 2022 AT 6:17 AM
    ‘The SC is deliberating on how to word its rejection of this petition.”

    Moot.

    NEXT!

Comments are closed.