There is a better question for the Unintentional Whistleblower Evelyn Farkas – IOTW Report

There is a better question for the Unintentional Whistleblower Evelyn Farkas

Farkas farked up on MSNBC when she disclosed to Mika that she was concerned that the incoming Trump administration might wipe clean all the intelligence they gathered on Trump.

“…if they found out how we knew what we knew about their … the Trump staff dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

A better question for Farkas, considering she has already admitted knowledge of Trump surveillance is “why did YOU, a private citizen, have knowledge of this intelligence?”

Zero Hedge –

Aside from what appears to be a brazen confirmation of spying on the Trump team, the bigger red flag here is Dr. Farkas wasn’t employed by the Obama administration at the time the Russian allegations arose.

According to Pentagon records, Dr. Farkas resigned in September of 2015.

So how did this non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and former deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia, gain knowledge of intelligence regarding members of Trump’s team and their relations with Russia, when she was the senior foreign policy advisor for Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton?

Farkas was the prime driver behind the anti-Russia phobia inside the Pentagon during the Obama years — shilling hard for the Ukraine — requesting that the President send them anti-tank missiles — which, essentially, would mean outright war with Russia.

Back to the interview with Mika Brzezinski. Dr. Farkas said ‘we’ had good intel on Russia. Who does she refer to when she says ‘we?’

Here’s Mark Levin’s take on this scandal.

Perhaps someone inside the Obama government was leaking to the Hillary campaign?

I think we all know what the answer is to the rhetorical question.

30 Comments on There is a better question for the Unintentional Whistleblower Evelyn Farkas

  1. Are they guilty of conspiracy, treason, collusion, and all them other big words that means big trouble? Yea. What will America, its press, and leaders do? Nothing.

    Why? Because this is business as usual in Washington, DC. No one really cares as long as you smear and smash your enemy.

    If caught, you laugh, say you are sorry about getting caught, and that you’ll make sure getting caught doesn’t happen again.

    Only the far left can put people (like Dinesh D’sousa or a videographer of islam) in jail for nothing in obama world.

    Yes I trust no one because the truth in no longer out there but in my faith and trust in God and Lord & Savior Jesus Christ.

  2. I have a question for Trey Gowdy fans. What has he accomplished other than a couple sound bites to use in his next campaigns? I would love to see someone, anyone, finish off a line of questioning on these criminals with something more than “that is all, thank you for you time”. And then the smug look on their faces like they just got the goods on Al Capone. Give me a frickin break!

  3. If called to testify she will either refuse to participate in a “McCarthyite witchhunt” or she will take the 5th. Either way, she skates. She knows that one does not offer testimony which impugns the Clintons if one desires a long and prosperous life.

  4. Another enormous scandal that seems to already have blown over is those 3 Muslim brothers that had DWS passwords for the DNC as well as access to a number of lib congressweasels on the intelligence committee? Are those guys even in the country still?

  5. Have to agree with Joe6pak, Trey Gowdy is all hat, no cattle. He endorsed “Lil’ Marco” (RINOe alternative to Jeb!) and headed the Benghazi Show trial with zero results. Somewhere down the line, he sold out to the UniParty and his main role is to keep the Conservative Base pacified. It’s all bread & circuses.

  6. Farkas is the perfect example of how these left wing snowflake elitists live in their echo chamber. It doesn’t occur to them that anyone would disagree with what they’re doing no matter how illegal and unethical they would scream about it if it was done to them.

    Fox needs to get more of these unschooled bureaucrats on and fewer paid shill talking heads if it wants to get to the truth.

    Project Veritas has demonstrated left wing cultists drop all barriers when they think they’re talking among other swamp dwellers.

    @Alan – I’m with you on Trey Gowdy. He puts on a great show but his inner workings are no different than any unipartier or RINO.

  7. @Uncle Al

    Eyesite iotwreport.com “Evelyn Farkas” 3

    Feel This IOTW Report – Dec 19, 2016
    …/feel-free-to-add-to-this-mosaic/

    Don Lemon Fake News – Feb 20, 2017
    …/don-lemon-cuts-off-cnn-contributor-after-he-calls-out-fake-news/

    Obama Administration Official Confirms – March 28, 2017
    …/obama-administration-official-confirms-obama-spied-on-trump/

    Zero One 2 Three
    Shout it out, Huey Lewis
    I O I O I O I O O

    “I was urging…”
    “…get as much intelligence as you can…”
    “I had a fear…”
    “…how we knew what we knew…”
    “I became very worried…”
    “…not enough was coming out…
    “I knew there was more…”
    “… talked to my former colleagues…”
    “…that’s why you have the leaking…”

    Conspiracy followed by Felony
    Not unnoticed Farkas was a civilian
    No clearance, badge, license ‘legal’ agreement
    With the “Government” or, as is,…US.
    Past Prolog
    Alcohol incident weeks and too weak ahead
    Hush-able media, don’tcha try
    We gotta bluebird, you’re gonna fry

  8. Something fishy about the blurting Farkas. I sense a new narrative being served up with a side of “rogue bureaucrat” scapegoat. She’s going to take the fall for the whole thing and get a DESTROYING reprimand from Gouty, and we’ll be Moving On once again.

  9. You can be guaranteed that when Hillary pops up on her leather jacket again, nobody will ask her about Farkas. Unless she wants to sadly proclaim how hurt she is to find out that Farkas went rogue. Then it will be the first question asked.

  10. You can be guaranteed that when Barky pops up in his leather jacket again, nobody will ask him about Farkas. Unless he wants to sadly proclaim how hurt he is to find out that Farkas went rogue. Then it will be the first question asked.

  11. Evelyn Farkus: 03-30-2017 15:09 PM EST

    “Process is really important”
    “So we can all understand whats the base understanding that they have…I think that’s a very professional Sober way to approach this.”

    She’ll be drinking to that.

  12. Just so we’re clear on this, Farkas didn’t blurt yesterday. She made her comments on March 2nd. Nobody noticed. Except President Trump, who made his wiretap tweets on March 4th.

Comments are closed.