A new survey of Native American opinions on the Washington Redskins’ nickname once again demonstrates underwhelming opposition to the moniker and just how out of touch the so-called “mainstream media” really is. The new survey duplicates the Washington Post’s 2016 poll finding that 90 percent of Natives are not offended by the Redskins’ nickname ― much to the disappointment of writers at the Post. Like Theresa Vargas, who insists the name is a dictionary-defined slur, no matter how many people accept the word.
“The Redskins’ name is a dictionary-defined slur, whether or not 10 percent of Native Americans or 50 percent of your co-workers or your favorite aunt acknowledge it.”
1snip1
Sit down and shut up, stupid.
“White racist progressive overlords” is the perfect description of the left.
If Native Americans had a do-over they would have built a wall, a big beautiful wall
Theresa, I’m offended by having to look at pale, porcine bubbleheads.
Put down the Ben and Jerry’s and get some sun.
https://www.facebook.com/TheresaVargasWapo/photos/a.1924801317539673/2037757942910676/?type=1&theater
Go to a pow wow…. They are fiercely patriotic
So…about 30 kilometers from Oaxaca Mexico is a town where people go to worship a tree, large, old tree. Nearby is a settlement of very private Sioux indians, and a very handsome squareness to their facial shape. They are red, very red. Sometimes they come in to pray at the tree by bus…Oral history says that they came by horse leaving a path of destruction and a great distance from their original home. They keep to themselves and are not liked by the locals…I am going in November to see them one last time as the young women and one man told me that I would back in 1992..Bring trinkets and money and they will merely rob you ..Redskin became a slur due to Leftists who do this everyday ..
They are a sight to see and quite remarkable in the deep yet bright red color..
I have a BIL who’s moral compass wildly spins in all directions, landing according to whomever he feels will recognize his humility or greatness.
He’s held lifetime Redskin tix (they’re passed down from generation to generation). Being the “humble” guy (not at all showy) purchased a Maserati, a SLC Roadster Mercedes, and an Odyssey Minivan for my sis and the kids. ALL vehicles HAD to be Redskin Maroon in color.
When the conundrum to keep or change the team’s name arose, all of a sudden he agrees, Redskin is racist.
That’s gonna be some expensive paint jobs.
She’s too white and fat to have an opinion on this.
After everything they’ve been put through, Native Americans continue to not be whiny soyboy pussies.
Interesting.
I agree that the Washington Redskins should change their name, something that would reflect the nation’s capital. How about the Washington Parasites, Washington Scumbags, Washington Overlords, or Washington Crooks?
Vargas? I guess she would be offended if anybody called her beaner, wetback, spic, messikin, or bitch.
^ Or “Washington Swamp Things,” Billy Fuster.
Let’s see if native americans (they actually aren’t) as a group prove themselves corrpt progressive jerkoffs or prove themselves to be respectable politicially. How? By their support or nonsupport of Fauxcahontas.
It’s been awhile, but I used to drive through the Navajo reservation NE of Flagstaff, AZ. Up near the four corners there’s a school proudly displaying a sign that reads, “Home of the Redskins”.
why is ‘Redskin’ offensive, when ‘Brown skin’ or ‘People of Color’ are not?
…. need a ruling here
@Billy Fuster: The Washington Foreskins, on account of all the dick heads in the Capitol.