20 Comments on Americans Reject Forced ‘Residential Diversity’
When you elect a totalitarian leftist president it pretty much doesn’t matter what the loser people want.
Certainly their criteria for allocating low income individuals will include areas such as the hamptons and beverly hills based on non discriminatory data.
Certainly their criteria for allocating high income individuals will include areas such as south side of Chicago and Detroit based on non discriminatory data.
How many pajama boys will be relocated to Baltimore or South Chicago in order to decrease racial strife?
Hahahaa
Hey, when they let low class, know nothing street negroes live in the White House then they can ….wait what!?!?
It’s a joke BFH don’t have a cow.
Bill Clinton already did this.
HE FORCED FANNY MAE to give mortgages to minority people who could not afford them, to people who literally did not have a job.
The federal program of mortgages for poor people was federal pressure on banks to make loans.
That was the economy crash in 2008. The chickens came home to roost, remember?
Can you say, “Government Insured Reverse Mortgage?”
oh wait! The NEW plan is for taxpayers to buy houses outright that will be given to the poor.
No doubt Home Owner Association fees and rules will be called racist, so taxpayers will have to hire illegal aliens to do the yard work.
The most disappointing thing I see in this report is that ONLY 86% oppose it…
The White Hut sure could use some diversification. We could start first with some humans and go from there!
Let’s try it out in Obama’s, Hi-liar-ry’s, and Zuckerberg’s neighborhoods first and see how it goes!
In say, 5-10 years (if we’re not dead from the chemtrails) if you have an extra room or rooms in your house our socialist government will force you to allow illegal/ghetto immigrants to occupy that space.
“I’m from the government and I’m here to kill you.”
Look around you. Can’t you see 30% have their head up their anus? It was 86% because they don’t understand anything.
Oh, I don’t know. When allowed, they pick the prison population pretty well. Plus, they seem to have reversed prejudice there. Lots of blacks per population! Swell and splendid.
Thing is, though, on a more serious note, I’m sort of hoping this goes through, at least in some areas. If the attack on middle class incomes hasn’t swayed the voting public, then perhaps a little more facetime with the people of color they seem to so love and cherish (from afar) would do them a world of good.
Unfortunately, that room has a nasty history of fatal smoke inhalation.
Chevy Chase, MD (90% white) is in sore need of diversity. Bring in the Section 8.
Chevy Chase, MD black population: less than 1%.
What happened to the comment edit function?
Edit is a feature reserved for the 1%.
you can take the African out of Africa , but not Africa out of the African !
When you elect a totalitarian leftist president it pretty much doesn’t matter what the loser people want.
Certainly their criteria for allocating low income individuals will include areas such as the hamptons and beverly hills based on non discriminatory data.
Certainly their criteria for allocating high income individuals will include areas such as south side of Chicago and Detroit based on non discriminatory data.
How many pajama boys will be relocated to Baltimore or South Chicago in order to decrease racial strife?
Hahahaa
Hey, when they let low class, know nothing street negroes live in the White House then they can ….wait what!?!?
It’s a joke BFH don’t have a cow.
Bill Clinton already did this.
HE FORCED FANNY MAE to give mortgages to minority people who could not afford them, to people who literally did not have a job.
The federal program of mortgages for poor people was federal pressure on banks to make loans.
That was the economy crash in 2008. The chickens came home to roost, remember?
Can you say, “Government Insured Reverse Mortgage?”
oh wait! The NEW plan is for taxpayers to buy houses outright that will be given to the poor.
No doubt Home Owner Association fees and rules will be called racist, so taxpayers will have to hire illegal aliens to do the yard work.
The most disappointing thing I see in this report is that ONLY 86% oppose it…
The White Hut sure could use some diversification. We could start first with some humans and go from there!
Let’s try it out in Obama’s, Hi-liar-ry’s, and Zuckerberg’s neighborhoods first and see how it goes!
In say, 5-10 years (if we’re not dead from the chemtrails) if you have an extra room or rooms in your house our socialist government will force you to allow illegal/ghetto immigrants to occupy that space.
“I’m from the government and I’m here to kill you.”
Look around you. Can’t you see 30% have their head up their anus? It was 86% because they don’t understand anything.
Oh, I don’t know. When allowed, they pick the prison population pretty well. Plus, they seem to have reversed prejudice there. Lots of blacks per population! Swell and splendid.
Thing is, though, on a more serious note, I’m sort of hoping this goes through, at least in some areas. If the attack on middle class incomes hasn’t swayed the voting public, then perhaps a little more facetime with the people of color they seem to so love and cherish (from afar) would do them a world of good.
Unfortunately, that room has a nasty history of fatal smoke inhalation.
Chevy Chase, MD (90% white) is in sore need of diversity. Bring in the Section 8.
Chevy Chase, MD black population: less than 1%.
What happened to the comment edit function?
Edit is a feature reserved for the 1%.
you can take the African out of Africa , but not Africa out of the African !