Grave incompetence or brazen dishonesty?
Those are the only two conclusions one can reasonably come to after reviewing Hillary Clinton’s stunning Sunday interview on local New Hampshire TV.
When WMUR local TV host Josh McElveen asked Hillary Clinton why her State Department greenlit the transfer of 20 percent of all US uranium to the Russian government, Clinton claimed she had no involvement in her own State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium One to Russia.
“I was not personally involved because that wasn’t something the secretary of state did,” said Clinton.
The transfer of 20 percent of US uranium — the stuff used to build nuclear weapons — to Vladimir Putin did not rise to the level of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s time and attention?
Beyond being an admission of extreme executive negligence on an issue of utmost national security, Hillary’s statement strains credulity to the breaking point for at least three other reasons.
“She was either dangerously incompetent or remains deeply dishonest.”
Why one or the other? She has proven to be both.
WTF was she doing as Secretary of State except racking up frequent flyer miles? I want back all the money we paid for her salary.
If Republicans, Dems, and Socialists campaigning for prez don’t shower this mess all over her and her perverted husband, then we all know the fix is in.
As was the case when Obama didn’t respond to Donald Trump’s challenge to produce his records from Columbia, I am drawing the most negative inference possible from Hillay’s deleted e-mails.