Follow up: The TweetStorm Promised by the Ex-Hillary Supporter

Dr. Robert Epstein@DrREpstein

#Trump tweet, point #1: I’ve never said that #Google deliberately “manipulated” the 2016 election, but I measured substantial pro-#Hillary bias in #Google‘s search results by preserving & analyzing 13,207 election-related searches & the 98,044 web pages linked to those searches.

#Trump tweet, point #2: The level of pro-#Hillary bias I found in #Google‘s search results – absent on #Bing & #Yahoo – was enough to convince between 2.6 & 10.4 million undecided voters to vote for Hillary. .@realDonaldTrump said 16 million; that’s wrong.

#Trump tweet, point #3: It doesn’t matter whether the bias in #Google search results was deliberate or not. Once it appeared – which it did at least 6 months before the election – it began shifting opinions & votes without people’s knowledge & without leaving a paper trail.

If you want the full story about my 2016 election monitoring project, read my essay, “Taming Big Tech: The Case for Monitoring,” published last year: …

Now, switching to .@HillaryClinton: This is going to hurt me to write, because I & my whole extended family have been strong supporters of the Clintons for decades. I have a framed, signed letter from #Bill on the wall near my desk. But #Hillary should be ashamed of herself.

@HillaryClinton said that my 2016 election monitoring project has been “debunked” & was “based on 21 undecided voters.” Both assertions are false, & both came from #Google. To understand what’s going on here, you need to know about the relationship between #Hillary & #Google.”

#Hillary has long depended on #Google for both money & votes. Her largest donor in 2016 was Alphabet/Google. Her Chief Technology Officer during the campaign was Stephanie Hannon, a former Google exec. And then there’s #EricSchmidt, longtime head of Google – the guy in the pic:

A leaked email showed that in 2014 #Google‘s #EricSchmidt offered to run #Hillary‘s tech campaign (see pic). In 2015, Schmidt in fact funded The Groundwork, a highly secretive tech company, the sole purpose of which was to put Clinton into office. …

View image on Twitter

15 Comments on Follow up: The TweetStorm Promised by the Ex-Hillary Supporter

  1. I hope you’re wearing a Kevlar vest, body armor and neck protection, plus have a taster for your food and drink. And watch for errant traffic, don’t stand on train platforms, or runways. And for heaven’s sake stay away from park benches.

    We’d hate to see you self-suicide.

  2. Any suggestions about how this guy gets it? Suffocation by pillow? Sudden heart attack after meeting friends for drinks? Airplane crash? Brain bleed while behind the wheel of car on a rainy night in D.C.? Opiate OD in a lonely park? Got drunk and wandered onto the train tracks?

  3. Eric Schmidt… I followed this crap back then as it was revealed on the web. Wish I had saved all the links. He is one evil sumbitch.

  4. And now you know why she spent most of the election season drinking and coughing. She thought she won before she announced she was running.

  5. That this nitwit *still* supports Hillary/Dems….
    (only goes to show you the power of the drug called Leftism)

  6. The ULTIMATE in naivete:

    “Hillary: If you examine my work carefully, you will find that it adheres to the very highest standards of scientific integrity. You will also conclude, I believe, that Google poses a serious threat to the free-&-fair election & to human autonomy. Google poses 3 serious threats to humanity: 1) an obscene level of surveillance across 200+ platforms, 2) the power to determine what content 2+ billion can or can NOT see (censorship) & 3) invisible #manipulation on a massive scale.”

    “Hillary: Is that what you want your legacy to be? Whistleblowers & leaks from #Google have confirmed that the company blacklists, re-ranks & uses “ephemeral experiences” (which I study) to control people worldwide. Do you approve? If Big Tech cos. support the same candidate in 2020, they can shift 15M votes her way without people knowing how the shift occurred. If you had a choice between preserving democracy & putting your candidate in office, which would you choose?”
    Does ANYONE wonder how a real-world Hillary – or ANY Leftist – would answer?!?

  7. Leftists crave power. They CRAVE it. They list for it. They’ll do anything say anything to get power. They’ll do anything say anything to keep power.

    I’ve always said that the next leftist tyrant like Woody Wilson or Frank Roosevelt will get their start as the president/chairman of an HOA or Condo Board. They get on the board and next thing you know you can’t have an American flag on display. It Fester’s and metastasizes from there

  8. When he’s found shot in the back of the head, rolled up in a rug, and deposited in two DIFFERENT locations in a local park, we’ll KNOW what happened… 😳

  9. The funniest part is that he’s a very proud behavorial psychologist for “40 years” and he’s never noticed the behavior of Hillary and Bill Clinton. I think that should call into question his credibility right there.

  10. Would it be too crass of me to start a pool for when Dr. Epstein here will commit suicide, or otherwise suffer an “unexpected” death?


Comments are closed.