Intel Whistlerblower Claim Looks Like Cover-Up To Protect Biden – IOTW Report

Intel Whistlerblower Claim Looks Like Cover-Up To Protect Biden

Friday, 20 September 2019, 18:30 Dr. Tar Uncategorized 20

Conservative Tree House

The mysterious “whistleblower” case now looks like a coordinated Democrat effort to block any investigation of presidential candidate Joe Biden for corrupt pressure on Ukraine to drop the investigation of Burisma, an energy company operating in the country, on which his son Hunter Biden was a board member.

In March 2016, then Vice-President Joe Biden warned Ukraine that $1 billion in loan guarantees would be withheld by the U.S. unless they replaced Viktor Shokin, the prosecutor general who was investigating Hunter Biden. Ukraine did remove Shokin, and the prosecution was dropped. It looks like a clear case of a quid-pro-quo.

However, as things are starting to shake out, the current obfuscation to protect Joe Biden is President Trump asking Ukraine’s new president Volodymyr Zelensky to take another look at the issues surrounding the former government’s decision to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor. This is presumably the call concerning to the whistleblower. To wit, democrats see this as Trump asking Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election. More

20 Comments on Intel Whistlerblower Claim Looks Like Cover-Up To Protect Biden

  4. I think there is a good chance that this is Trump outsmarting the donkeys again. The media has avoided this story like the plague. Now they think they have something on Trump, and now Biden is going to end up with all this bad press about shaking down the Ukrainians.

    19

  6. Once you get past the propaganda spouted by the left-wing media, the only difference between a really dumb liberal and a well-educated one comes down to the number of syllables in their drivel.

    12

  10. Like I said in the previous thread on this, it appears that Biden is running to stay out of jail. If he weren’t running, he’d be exposed, with no media cries that Trump is using his office to target political opponents ( or “enemies”, as the journos like to slant it). Barky might have told Joe that he didn’t have to run, but ol’ Joe was smart enough to figure out that running was his magic shield.

    6

  15. I am shocked! Yesterday all of the anonymous sources familiar with the situation but not authorized to talk about it were saying Trump blocked a whistle blower to protect himself.

    Now THIS! IT’S TOO LATE, the “narrative” was established yesterday.

    4

  16. I hope so, Bob M. but the Deepers, much like they demand recusals in order to hamper investigations, are declaring certain actions are not allowed to be taken by an officeholder against his declared opponent. Of course, these rules only apply to Republicans, as no Dem has ever recused himself from anything or refused to use his office to go after opponents. Two years of AG Sessions…man, what a waste of time that was.

    8

  19. It’s time for deep look into the history of the whistleblower. It’s just too convenient for him to come out now and the blatant appearance of Biden interference in the Ukraine is to damn obvious to ignore.

    1

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.