This is incredibly difficult for me to do but I feel that it’s necessary to come forward and expose the type of person that Trump will select for the Supreme Court of the great country.
I was raped by whoever Trump selects to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg for the Supreme Court.
It was in the 1990s and the details are a little fuzzy. We were at a party and I distinctly remember this person coming on to me and rubbing up against me.
I told this person I wasn’t interested but whoever it was persisted and when we were alone forced himself or herself on me, pulling off my clothes and penetrating me while I constantly said, “No!”
I haven’t come forward yet because I was ashamed and afraid. This person is clearly very powerful, but now that this person is being considered for the Supreme Court, I think it’s necessary to let people know who they’re dealing with, especially after Trump picked a literal serial killer last time…
Well I’d gladly be raped by any of the three women he’s considering. Probably worth noting I just told wifey that and she has declared me a pig.
(Sniff!)… I just wanted to say that I too was raped by whoever Trump nominates for SCOTUS next week. I never said anything about it until now because of my intense fear of whoever it is Trump will be nominating next week… (sob!)
@Brad — How many times has she done that now? (-:
Uncle Al
Ah, that depends. Do I need to include the times she says it in her sleep?
BB, tried your line on the lovely little missus. She thought about that for a few seconds then philosophically said, “well, as long as she’s of sound mind I don’t suppose there’s any reason they can’t have a blind woman on the Supreme Court.”
Will President Trump appoint a real live rapist to fill RBG’s spot on the Supreme Court or will he appoint a therapist to assess how screwed up the democrap party is?
judgeroybean
LOL, oh dude, you’re in deep shit and way over matched. I wish you luck.
I’m in the same boat, but I’ve perfected the art of acting stupid.
RBG certainly raped the Constitution. Contrary to Libtard beliefs, it’s not a living document.
@ judgeroybean Ouch, she’s good. Real good.
If it’s Amy Coney Barrett, it’s going to be quite a bizarre spectacle to see what the smear will be.
I spent today listening to three YT videos that are well worth the time to anyone interested in her background and also bringing yourself back to the reality of how really vile the Senate Communist Democrats are.
We should have a contest here at IOTWReport about what the possible smear(s) will be. The Destruction of Persons Politics will be on full Eleventy in the coming confirmation hearings. Schumer just said that everything will be on the table. Staffers are probably into their 9th box of Starbucks Espresso Blend, with Red Bull chasers, right about now.
A Conversation with Judge Amy Coney Barrett ’97 J.D. (Full Interview) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HMAHnT-y7c
Hesburgh Lecture 2016: Professor Amy Barrett at the JU Public Policy Institute https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yjTEdZ81lI
Supreme Revenge (full film) | FRONTLINE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yt2xUJfdyw
I was very surprised by the Frontline film. No one tried to soft soap or make a stab at justifying the Commie Dem’s breathtaking attempted axe murder of both Clarence Thomas and Bret Kavanaugh on prime time television. It’s well worth a review in case you thought any of Trump’s nominees would sail on through the hearings.
It’s time to gird our loins once again for another installment of “The Hunt for Pornographic Adjectives, Nouns and Verbs to Describe One of America’s Most Celebrated Legal Minds and Catholic Mother of Seven.”
Not going to be Barrett. It’ll be Barbara Lagoa.
Brad — what makes you say that?
Whoever Trump nominates will have midnight riots on their front lawn, be followed and harassed throughout the day, and subjected to uniformly hostile media coverage. Who needs that?
Barbara Lagoa from a family of Cuban immigrants is now federal judge
She was the attorney for the family of Elián González.
This is the Trumpster’s play. No question
Has anyone heard how much the Dems are paying to make up….I mean recount the horrific things done to one’s self and to debase one’s self and make one’s self look like a crazy, insane whack job to try to stop Trump’s nominee?
Speaking of RBG has anyone else heard about enough of the fawning over her nonstop the last few days? When Scalia died it was a mix of criticism, and praise by others but most importantly it was brief. The old biddy wasn’t the constitutional paragon they’re claiming just a flaky old lady with peculiar ideas.
Enough about her, can we move on?
For the women they will go for the treatment of the children, being religious zelots, decisions made from the bench/laws voted on. Oh and too much time in front of the make-up mirror!
Before it starts I always like to ask the question: How committed and dedicated do you have to be to agree to be nominated to these positions? It amazes me that anyone (except libtards like Biden who think they’re on a mission from GAWD) would place themselves in such harms way.
I mean I was in the service and I was shot at and all but I’d rather do that again then willingly face the smug holier than thou Chuckie S. in a Senate hearing.
God Bless whoever it will be and God Bless America to still have such people.
Yes I am way sick of notorious RBG already — can’t she join John Brown and “smoulder” in the grave already?
@gin blossom – they used to call it an idiot box because of what it did to people who watched it. now, I firmly believe it can still be called that because of the people who are on it.
lololol
Sounds like Brad doesn’t mind being sodomized with a cactus. Go easy on the boy…a corn cob is more genteel.