SEATTLE’S PROGRESSIVE FANS EVEN MORE OUTRAGED BY TERRIBLE PLAY CALL – IOTW Report

SEATTLE’S PROGRESSIVE FANS EVEN MORE OUTRAGED BY TERRIBLE PLAY CALL

16912533-mmmain

16 Comments on SEATTLE’S PROGRESSIVE FANS EVEN MORE OUTRAGED BY TERRIBLE PLAY CALL

  1. HAHAHAHA!!! Tough loss – karma’s a bitch, but Proggies know that, right?

    Most disgusting? Peat Care-oil working that gum like a cud chewing cow on speed. 2nd – Sherman showing he can count to 24. Hey, Jerkwad – got two fingers of my own! You’re NUMBER ONE, times two.

    Was cheering the heroic exploits of both teams to that point….and then SeeAddled’s juvenile. thug culture started to show.

  2. What sleeping giant said ^^. It was mostly a tremendous play by the rookie, jumping the route. That quick slant in is very hard to defend and IMO a pretty safe call down there, usually. But handing to the Beast probably would have been a better outcome for Seattle 😉

  3. Sleeping,
    I disagree.
    I was laughing when they set up in shotgun before the play started.

    This is exactly like a baseball player, down one run in the 9th, hits a gapper with 2 outs and rounds second heading for third.
    Whether the guy makes it or not I’m screaming as soon as he rounds 2nd that the guy is an asshole.

    There are simply moves made in sports that are so low percentage and so counter-intuitive to how the game should be played and so stupid, that successful or not you are witnessing idiocy.

  4. What’s wrong with a baseball analogy?

    What I’m saying is that there is no way that play would be called genius even if they had scored.

    At best they’d be saying “whoa, they won in spite of the idiocy of that call.”

    3 downs to move the ball one yard with a RB that was at the top in the league in yardage, and had 5 yards per carry (and coughed the ball up ONCE all season), yet
    they opt to put the ball in the air in the middle of the field? (Maybe, maybe, you run a route towards the sideline where there is no chance of an interception. It’s still stupid compared to giving the ball to Lynch.)

    It’s the same as the baseball scenario, except that you would never see the 3rd base coach waving a runner to third, down one run with 2 outs.

    Why risk ending the game being thrown out at third, when being at third is not as important as the next batter getting a chance at the plate?

    Any runner passing second is doing that all on his own, and he’s an idiot. A coach would be fired for waving the runner to third.
    Carroll, allowing the ball to be thrown at the 1 yard line with 3 downs to move the ball 1 yard, is that coach waving the runner to third.

Comments are closed.