The Fallacy of Gun Control Explained in 47 Seconds – IOTW Report

The Fallacy of Gun Control Explained in 47 Seconds

Send this to a progressive douchenugget TODAY.

12 Comments on The Fallacy of Gun Control Explained in 47 Seconds

  1. Gee Wally, Liberals are telling us that guns should only be in the hands of people who will tell you that unemployment is 5% with 94,610,000 people out of work.
    I… think… I… get… it…

  2. Mao’s minions in China killed all the “intellectuals” because he thought they were too smart to control. Rumor has it that they were easily identified because they wore glasses and, therefore, must be able to read.
    I bet the minions used guns.

  3. Stefan Molyneux is indeed brilliant. Along the lines of a Pat Condell. Check out this gem
    and cut-and-paste his paragraph on gun control and send it around, as Fur suggests:

    “If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it’s not that you are anti-gun. You’ll need the police’s guns to take away other people’s guns. So you are very pro-gun, you just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small, political elite and their minions.” – Stefan Molyneux

  4. I’d like to make sure all leftist were disarmed and had no access to any weapons whatsoever; then let the police loose on them.

  5. “Gun control” has the same
    as Marx’s “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.”

    WHAT “bait and switch”?

    Leaving out the salient point:
    The Government shall take from each according to his abilities, and the Government shall giveto each according to his needs as determined by the Government.”

  6. “Every Communist must grasp the truth; ‘Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.'”

    — Mao Tse Tung

Comments are closed.