American Thinker
Climate scientists recently discovered that they’ve been underestimating the impact of a particular organic compound in the atmosphere, and the oversight’s significance is so profound that it’s left existing climate models completely obsolete. As Jo Nova writes, “This is so big, it may change the sacred ‘climate sensitivity’ of the whole Earth”.
Isoprene is what’s known as a volatile organic compound, or a VOC, and “has a recognized role in protecting plants against many abiotic stresses” like “heat stress…drought…[and] oxidative stress” with trees being the greatest emitters. (When the chemical isoprene interacts with other compounds in the atmosphere, the products are a number of secondary organic aerosols.) More
Hell, the weather guessers still can’t get the day-to-day weather right. Forget about the climate bullshit.
Before there was OnlyFans, we had hot Mexican weather girl;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL_URqVZaWU&ab_channel=NotoriousFavi
We have no climate models worth spit. This has been proven by supplyong them with data from the last hundred years, minus 30, and looking at what they predict for the last thirty. Pure shit.
The models and the raw data have been ‘adjusted’ to generate a desired outcome. This is not science, it’s agenda driven politics.
Moving temperature probes from open fields to over blacktop parking lots is no science of global warming, excuse me. If Al Gore and the little ‘how dare you’ brat could shut up we would eliminate ‘global warming’, excuse me, ‘climate change’
An endless source of frustration, if anyone wants such a thing, can be readily found in attempts to get a climate loony to realize that building and running climate models has nothing to do with science. The output of a climate model isn’t science. It isn’t even knowledge.
Garbage in, garbage out.
The models are off because they’re not models. They’re a bunch of bad assumptions wrapped inside some piss poor number crunching designed to yield a predetermined outcome in order to keep the bureaucrat bucks coming in.
Dumb Bunnies: “You left out “new ice age.”
CO2 is essential for plant growth. We need more CO2.
These wako scientists create models based upon what the crazy Leftists tell them to create. I think the best place still to go is the Farmer’s Almanac, at least until the Leftists totally invade that publication.
I know this article must be false, because experts have told me that “the science is settled.”
DRILL, BABY, DRILL
39 days until mean Tweets and cheap gas are great again.
By the numbers… Isoprene appears to be bigger than all non-catalytic converter vehicle emissions post 1973… The Earth abides. Go figure.
KR
You want to know the weather, go outside.
Sometimes it is hot, sometimes it is cold. Sometimes it is just right.
fuck off.
The Mexican weather girl is a climate model I can get behind!
“Why Climate Models Are Way Off”
Because they’re pure, unadulterated BULLSHIT supportive of a (very lucrative) HOAX.
No amount of isoprene is going to change that.
mortem tyrannis
izlamo delenda est …
Maybe Mark Steyn can be reimbursed. He was sued in Canada for debunking the hockey stick model.
The climate scientists are really going to be upset. They are basically getting caught for deciding outcomes before actual research was done.
If they had done real research they would have studied all atmospheric gasses.
$$$$$$
Well, you know what they say…you can fool 97% of the scientists some of the time…
Maps can be useful, but a map is not the territory.
Climate models are so far wrong because the idiots put global warming (OK, climate change) in the software. Fortunately my weather training as a very important part of being a pilot has exposed the so fvcking dumb meteorologists that weather forecasting is no longer a profession but nothing more than a fart in the frying pan.
“All models are wrong. Some models are useful.”
– unknown
Rewrite “All idiots are wrong. Some idiots are useful.”
– some communist bastard or another.