4 Years After Syrian Refugees Entered Denmark Only 17% Are Employed – IOTW Report

4 Years After Syrian Refugees Entered Denmark Only 17% Are Employed

Sorry, these are not talented motivated people. If you have a welfare state, you’re going to attract people best suited for welfare.

That’s SCIENCE.

10News-

Translated from DKA:

“A review of employment among the four largest refugee groups in Denmark shows that after four years in the country only between 13 and 17 percent are employed.

Only 17 percent of Syrians are employed after four years in Denmark. Only 13 percent of Afghans have found work after four years.”

ht- pumpyourstillskin

10 Comments on 4 Years After Syrian Refugees Entered Denmark Only 17% Are Employed

  1. Anyone who didn’t waste their time watching Saturday Night Live this evening I can sum it up for you:

    ‘Those that oppose Syrian immigration are a bunch of idiot bigots.’

    It was incredibly disgusting.
    Skit after skit and the weekend update had the same theme.
    If you didn’t watch, you are wiser than I, sigh…when will I learn?

    Of course the name ‘Obama’ wasn’t mentioned during the entire show.

  2. I don’t care what country you talk about, when Welfare pays for everything the system essentially underwrites giving them the ability to reproduce, generation after generation and allows them all the time in the world to cause trouble and chaos. Turn off the spigot and make them work for a living and a lot of this will change real quick. Until then we are simply financing our own demise!

  3. I’ve been thinking about the whole refugee thing and I think we have been doing all of them a huge disservice. This is what I wrote in a Facebook post last night:
    Why in the world are western nations bringing refugees into their countries? How does that help the refugees? They are moved against their will into a culture that is not theirs. Nations do not mix cultures well, as Europe has proven. It’s one thing when a person emigrates to the US or another country because he wants to avail himself of the opportunity there, willing to become a part of their culture to become successful. It is entirely another to bring refugees in with what? Welfare, no real chance to get a job, meaning a lifetime of being taken care of by the government in an alien culture. It’s pretty obvious why the riots have happened in Paris in past years, regardless of last week’s atrocities. They are all on welfare, with no opportunity to get off it, and they have nothing to do except riot. And how many refugees actually return home? I’m talking about all refugees brought into the US over the past decades, from any country. Did a significant number go home, after it was safer, or are they pretty much all still here?
    It would be far cheaper, we could actually help far more refugees, by setting them up somewhere near their homeland. Certainly there are places in Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, etc. where they can be taken care of, even if western countries paid. China has entire cities built, with power and everything, which stand empty. Why not move Syrians there, where they could live together until they are able to return home?
    It seems to me that bringing refugees into ones’ country is a western guilt thing. Has the well-being of the refugees been considered, or is it just being done to assuage guilt?

  4. 400.000 Somali muslim parasites in the uk 88% on welfare ,beat that Denmark ! oh! 87% of black females also on welfare ! with 82% of black children live in one parent homes . oh ! 21,000 prisoners in uk jails are muslim men compared to 4 buddists/ 120 jews and 865 Sikh/hindu [ed uk ]

Comments are closed.