The Federalist’s Ryan Anderson looks to the pro-life movement as inspiration for reclaiming traditional marriage now that the Supreme Court has overrode the process of addressing the demand, or lack of, for gay marriage.
Anderson points out that the left is trying (often times successfully) to define those who support traditional marriage as bigots and that adds an additional hurdle that pro-lifers did not have to overcome.
To regain the forum Anderson proposes a three step strategy.
1.) The SCOTUS ruling was judicial activism of the worst kind.
2.) Fight for the right to oppose gay marriage in thought, speech and behavior.
3.) Don’t retreat from the public square.
Off Topic: Drudge did not report anything all day about the Planned Parenthood story today until WaPo wrote it. Shame on Drudge!
In my years of living I have noticed that most women tend to establish relationships with their thoughts or concepts being guided by love or wishing for it. Men on the other hand are socially, instinctively, and biologically driven by “sex”. Love develops later or more slowly. While is quite understandable and natural to see that gays tend to “love” each other sooner or later, it is the MEN who are driven by “sex” as a first priority and as an initial attractant to other men OR women. Gay MEN practice some very disgusting habits……….and that is what differentiates them from gay women. This is not an absolute either way……but is the most prevalent situation. Older gay men tend to become pedophiles much more readily partly because of the male aggressiveness. It’s just the way it is folks. Making your sexual deviancy into a political statement is also unseemly……..
Brilliantly stated, sir.
Now that’s a rainbow I can understand.
Yes but almost half of that blue also supports gay marriage.
The colors of the perverts flag!
Red: Sodomy
Orange: Lesbianism
Yellow: Transgender
Green: Pedophilia
Blue: Bestiality
Purple: Necrophilia