Breaking: Kenosha prosecutors WITHHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from Kyle Rittenhouse Defense Team – IOTW Report

Breaking: Kenosha prosecutors WITHHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from Kyle Rittenhouse Defense Team

28 Comments on Breaking: Kenosha prosecutors WITHHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from Kyle Rittenhouse Defense Team

  1. Is there anyone here with a legal background who can tell me what the practical and legal differences for Mr. Rittenhouse would be between, on the one hand, the judge declaring a mistrial with prejudice, and, on the other hand, the judge ordering directed not guilty verdicts?

    7
  2. Uncle Al – with ‘prejudice’ means he could never be retried again concerning the case, effectively closing the door to any additional charges stemming from this incident.

    Not guilty verdicts means he can’t be retried on those specific charges, but the prosecution could bring additional charges against him in the future should any “evidence” be found.

    20
  3. Uncle Al, it seems to me the judge is willing to let this play out.
    It looks to be a hung jury since they took all day and couldn’t come to a unanimous conclusion.
    Of course they may have already but didn’t want to issue a verdict during the dark hours. Better dump it in the AM

    “High Plains Drifter” is on The Movie Channel in a few minutes so I plan to watch it and harken back to better times when justice was a beautiful thing…

    20
  4. All that is required is consequences (real), and removal of judicial immunity.
    Start punishing these criminal commies, things will return to the right timeline. Lets start with 2020 election.

    13
  5. I don’t think that there is any question that the Democratic Prosecutor conducted this trial as a warning to anyone who would dare resist the next wave of a Democratic/Progressive attack. Rittenhouse got outside legal aid or he would have been dead meat. Now the Democratic Governor has called out the National Guard. I suspect he is worried that the police will protect “their” town and “their” people and that the local population will back them. The next wave of Progressive invaders and thier hired transport will be at risk. Fine. But if the democratic Prosecuter isn’t removed, he will hold the entire population at risk. He has openly said that there is no right of self-defense when Party Storm Troopers or their ghetto rats from Milwaukee or Chicago are involved. Kenosha is a fairly small town. The owners and employees of the trashed businesses (and the jurors) are friends and neighbors. The DA (Prosecutor) has to be gone. The Guard are locals but it pays to remember that the Guard was used to protect the coup in Washington. The Guard may have to choose sides.

    9
  6. I don’t care what they do. I’m going to use the Rodney King rule and get this kid on Federal Civil Rights charges in rigged Federal courts either way.

    For the good of the Party and my future Supreme Court appointment.

    Forward!

    6
  7. Very smart of Kyle’s lawyers.
    If you read the motion they show evidence tampering and real evidence being withheld by the prosecution.
    Then they point out that if the defendant went through the entire trial then a mistrial is granted it’s a double jeopardy situation and Kyle can’t be tried again for the same charges.

    If the defense attorneys had asked for a mistrial before the trial was complete the prosecutors could charge Kyle again.
    If a mistrial is granted now they can’t.

    This also lets the jury off the hook.
    Two of them were holding out because they’re afraid of the mob.
    Although everyone knew this was a high profile case and thugs would try to intimidate.

    11
  8. Tyranny twists the “law” to its own purposes. The fact that Mr. Rittenhouse is being “prosecuted” is proof that the sense of “law” as we thought we knew it is dead. It is now a heavy cudgel in the hands of the totalitarians, who wield it against those who stand slightly above the sheeple – stick your head up and you will be struck.
    From the beginnings of human existence self-defense has been a given. Not a right, but an obligation – an obligation to society. One who would not defend himself was only worthy of the most base slavery – for if he would not defend himself, he would not defend his family, his tribe, his community, or his land.

    And We, the People of the United States, are failing to defend OUR nation, our Constitution, our Republic, and our way of life.
    We need to shake off this numbing ennui before it is too late.

    Fuck Joe Biden
    mortem tyrannis

    izlamo delenda est …

    11
  9. “The corrupt liberal media came for me, just like they came for Kyle Rittenhouse, and if he decides to sue I say go for it and hold the media accountable.”

    –NICHOLAS SANDMANN

    9
  10. @Tim – FJB November 17, 2021 at 11:12 am

    > The Police APPREHEND – they do NOT DEFEND.
    > Your proposal is based on a faulty premise.

    Oooh! A word wizard! Tell me, Timmeh… Are you an egg that sits on a wall? Or a woman with a penis?

    A “proposal” that does not exist, is as faulty as your insistence that reality changes because you change the words, when you can’t grasp the premise.

  11. Anonymous: When seconds count, the police are minutes away.

    https://youtu.be/k25xA4c85F4

    Beachmom: If the jury is deadlocked and a mistrial is declared, the defendant can be retried. Since there was no verdict, the defendant is considered NOT to have been in jeopardy. I saw a case covered on TV where a deputy was shot and killed. At the trial, the defence brought up that the defendant could not have done the shooting intentionally because he suffered “Drunken Indian Syndrome” (a real diagnosis meaning that a person’s body control is diminished because of heavy alcohol intake over a long period of time). The prosecution was not ready for this. Unfortunately for the defendant (but fortunately for society), rather than get an acquittal, the jury was deadlocked and a mistrial was declared. Before the case was retried, the prosecution went had experts analyze the shooting and show that it was committed by someone with great precision and control. The defendant was found guilty of premeditated murder. Point being was that it was first declared a mistrial and it was retried. I believe the term is that the first trial did not result in an outcome because it was not “adjudicated.” However, there may be times that the prosecution does not feel it is worth it to try again, perhaps because they know the case is weak and they would not do any better the second time. However, since the prosecutor has no interest in Justice in the Rittenhouse case, he probably would try again unless the judge shuts him down,

  12. Anonymous,
    If you object to the clear statement of the DC ex-Chief of Police that the police do not DEFEND, but that they APPREHEND, then take it up with the ex-Chief.
    If you believe the statement to be false, prove it so.

    Descending into sophomoronicisms and insults is puerile.

    Try to keep the sunny side up.

    izlamo delenda est …

    1
  13. RadioMattM, Kyle lives in Il, not cheeseville dumbas, don’t tell me he never had this gun in Illinois. Somehow it magically just appeared.
    Gun laws were violated in 2 states. Underage at time of purchase, hidden purchase violated laws & more gun laws were criminally violated. How was it registered, most likely illegally.

    1
  14. The gun was kept in Wisconsin. Follow the damn trial. Whether he had the gun in Illinois at some point is totally irrelevant. The question is what was the case on that day in August last year.

    He does have family and friends in Kenosha. He has worked in Kenosha. He has connections with Kenosha. Scotty did not beam him down from the Enterprise making that the first time he saw the place.

    2
  15. “The existence of a police force negates the acceptance of self-defense. By design.”

    How so? The Police cannot “defend” you – at all. They would have to be omnipotent and omnipresent. You proved nothing. You re-stated a trope.

    Explain, please, how the mere existence of a Police Force negates self-defence.
    Simply because the state has reserved unto itself all manifestations of violence doesn’t imply that the unlawful will abide by that reservation or that citizens have no right to self-defence.

    The concept is obtuse and legally, nonsense.

    izlamo delenda est …

    1
  16. @Tim – FJB November 17, 2021 at 5:04 pm

    > Simply because the state has reserved unto itself all manifestations of violence

    Need I say more?

    > doesn’t imply that the unlawful will abide by that reservation

    I guess so.

    > or that citizens have no right to self-defence

    You just, this, the current post, posited that the state has denied the proles “all manifestations of violence”. How should they peacefully defend themselves against unlawful violence. Especially when that violence is, as always can be, intitiated under color of law?

  17. @ Anonymous NOVEMBER 17, 2021 AT 1:48 PM

    You do not know what you speak of. You are only repeating the incorrect propaganda narrative being pushed by the left.

    You know nothing.

    The gun was already in Wis., but you would know that if you had paid SOME attention to reality and had actual truth as your guiding light instead of deep, delusional, political bias you want to push everywhere.

    3

Comments are closed.