Gloria Allred Refuses Third-Party Handwriting Analysis on Roy Moore Yearbook – IOTW Report

Gloria Allred Refuses Third-Party Handwriting Analysis on Roy Moore Yearbook

Breitbart: Tuesday on CNN’s “New Day,” Gloria Allred, a lawyer representing Alabama U.S. Senate hopeful Roy Moore accuser Beverly Young Nelson, declined to offer up a high school yearbook for a third-party analysis she presented as evidence to strengthen her client’s claim that she was sexually harassed by Moore as a minor.

The yearbook in question purportedly has Moore’s signature, which has been called into question by those with the Moore campaign. Allred told “New Day” co-host Camerota she would only allow a handwriting analysis if Moore agreed to testify under oath.

Partial transcript as follows:

CAMEROTA: If no Senate committee takes this on, can’t you just go to a third-party handwriting analyst to solve this?

ALLRED: We could. But the key person is Roy Moore. And let me just say, one other misleading statement that Roy Moore said — because in a letter to Sean Hannity, he said, “Well, our client, Beverly Nelson,’ he said, “appeared before me.” “Before me” was the quote in the letter, which I’m sure you have.

CAMEROTA: During the divorce proceeding —

ALLRED: During the divorce proceeding. Since he said that, her Alabama divorce attorney from the time has said publicly and to me that she never appeared before Roy Moore because the case — they reconciled, the parties reconciled without her going before him.

CAMEROTA: So, there are inconsistencies. I hear you.

ALLRED: You can call them inconsistencies if you wish to be kind. I would rather not call them inconsistencies. They were misleading statements.

CAMEROTA: But can you put some of this to rest by going to a neutral third-party and looking at the handwriting in the yearbook, wouldn’t that help?

ALLRED: Again, if he’s willing to testify under oath, yes.

CAMEROTA: Without that. In the absence of that, will you turn it over?

ALLRED: When you say in the absence of that, it’s not just a footnote. This is extremely important. And if he is elected, clearly the Senate Select Committee on Ethics will hold a hearing.

CAMEROTA: Fine. But before that.

ALLRED: At that time there will be testimony not just by my client. I expect others as well.

CAMEROTA: This would be good information for voters to have before that.

ALLRED: It would be good.

CAMEROTA: Authentic signature in the yearbook. Why not turn it over?  read more

18 Comments on Gloria Allred Refuses Third-Party Handwriting Analysis on Roy Moore Yearbook

  1. Maybe they’re working on a digital image which they’ll let friendly journos look at for a minute from a distance behind a glass enclosure, so that doubts about its authenticity can be erased. Hey, it worked for Barky.

  2. And further news about Moore’s accusers; the ex-cop is related to drug dealers, two sons, one who was killed before he could stand trial, the other went to jail for dealing drugs. Her brother was prosecuted by Moore for dealing drugs.

    Then another convicted drug dealer, the brother of David Hagedorn who is a WP editor went before Moore on contempt charges for back pay of child support and alimony.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cXK6zhGZ24

  3. Allred knows the writing is fake; if it was genuine, she would be beating a path to the best handwriting analyist she could find. In fact, if the writing was genuine, she wouldn’t want Moore to testify and have a chance to explain himself.

    Allred is just engaging in political theater, which she does frequently. It’s easy to dismiss this motive, but by promoting a political agenda, Allred is doing her client a disservice.

  4. Ms. Allred deserves to be disbarred or at least censured by the bar. Why the Judge in this case isn’t ordering the yearbook (which as I am led to understand provides the bedrock to this litigation) turned over to a third party is beyond me. I want to see who is paying Ms. Allred because when the election is over, should Mr. Moore lose, Allred will be out of there like a bolt of lightening andthe litigant sure can’t afford her fees.

  5. “There’s NO EVIDENCE of voter fraud, and we don’t want you snooping around to look for any either!”

    “We have EVIDENCE of sexual misconduct, but we don’t want you to examine it either!”

Comments are closed.