Ginsburg v. Thomas In Indiana Abortion Restriction Law – IOTW Report

Ginsburg v. Thomas In Indiana Abortion Restriction Law

The Supreme Court sent a mixed message to the nation on abortion today. The court chose to leave in place 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruling against Indiana state provisions preventing selection by race, sex or disability, but ruled that the same lower court erred in finding against other provisions requiring proper burial of fetal remains. More

While the ruling, at best, is going to be viewed as a partial victory for both sides, the footnotes of Justices Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg have caused a stir in the adamant arguments and personal nature of their opinion. Thomas made a strong argument that abortion selection is nothing more than warmed over eugenics, a philosophy of destroying those deemed unworthy long discredited and associated with Nazi breeding and genocide programs. Here

Icon of both radical feminist and abortion supporters, Ginsburg, tried to make an argument that a women receiving an abortion was not a “mother” and that the disposal of her unborn child is an “undue burden” upon her. More

9 Comments on Ginsburg v. Thomas In Indiana Abortion Restriction Law

  1. It amazes me how Aldous Huxley saw this coming all those years ago when he wrote Brave New World. The idea of motherhood was considered the most offensive thing imaginable.

    10
  2. The Court is extremely busy and has to be selective about which cases to take up. Another article suggested that they were waiting for a better case to come along, knowing that several are coming through the courts. The challenge with any specific case is that they are supposed to deal only with the specifics of law that were applied.

    3
  3. I wish RBG would stop playing bridge with Arlen Specter, Hoffa, and JFK and admit she’s not coming back. Folks are going to get suspicious of the DC body-double and blow this whole damn charade wide open.

    8
  4. The Late Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s clerks should not be allowed to continue ghostwriting SC opinions under their former employer’s stationary.

    I realize this may strike some as necrophobic but, I assure you, that some of my best friends are dead.

    2

Comments are closed.