Reddit reader, MRB88, reposts a story from Forbes earlier in the year that asked
What’s to Become of China’s Ghost Cities?
China’s central planners screwed up and were forced to build entire cities that are sitting in the middle of nowhere, doing nothing. The electricity is on, the plumbing flushing. There just isn’t any people.
Psssst —- Syrian City.
How can you say no? And if you can say no, why can’t everyone else say no?
How about this instead:
France, Russia, and the USA stomp the shit out of those goat molesters in short order.
Then let the other Sunni Arabs pull security as all those Syrians can GO HOME!
Fix the root problem, and you won’t have any refugees.
The China option is out. I would rather live on the moon.
China didn’t screw up, Fur. They had no work for their citizens and knew these would be empty cities from the get-go. Considering how shoddy and rickety Olympic structures were, no one’s too hep on the stability of these high-rises (in other words, they’d be perfect for the Moslems!) but China is no dummy country. There’s no way in Hades they’d ever agree to take these threats to their iron rule.
Hmmm, perhaps because China has a Great Wall?
How about Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, etc. take in some of these moslems?
Moral obligation?
Who are the “moral” countries in this world?
I can’t think of one, not even the territory of the Vatican.
What obligations are there to rescue diseased Rats from a sinking ship when the rescued will spread their disease among healthy populations?
The disease of islam, like the black plague, must be eradicated before it spreads further.
Russia needs to take double what we take
Slightly off topic:
Merkel, who hath wrought this mess, was on the way to the stadium:
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/germany-terror-alert-ambulance-packed-explosives-parked-front-soccer-stadium
Let em go there. If they cause any mischief, China will rip their chests open and sell em for body parts.
Since when did they find morals? Who are they deriving these morals from? God?
How about all of them except for the Christians,
we can take them.
I suggest:
The Sahara Desert, it stretches from 3,500,000 square miles and is sparsely populated. This huge and serene desert could offer some of the finest and most popular islamic tourist attractions and activities for 7th century islamists; like unfettered genocide, head chopping, caning, honor killing, stoning, stabbing, pedophilia, bestiality, halal approved homosexuality, rape, plunder and exploding muslims.
What fun it will be, bring the whole family, join the fun filled Sahara Club.
Their almighty, magnificent and highly moral U.N. Human Rights Council.
Their mission: “a larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all”. (except Jews & Christians)
I dunno…any moslem that sees the view in this pic depicted will have one of 2 reactions.
1: What? the Twin Towers are still erect? I keel myself now! (and he commits Harry Aloha Snackbar Kerry on the street) (May allah have all his pieces!)
or
2: Will see the Twin Towers and run full speed at them and head but them, which will kill him (May allah have all his pieces!)
So, I guess, in conclusion, Yeah, let China have them.
What about the moral obligation to protect our yown citizens first? Well, we know what Obama thinks about that.
But really, we should refuse to take these refugees in because not only are they non-diverse, they come from countries that are not diverse at all. I say, until those countries display the same diverse and multicultural societies that we have that we refuse entry.