Conspiracy Theorists of the Country Unite – A Vote For Trump Means an Outsider is Going to Blow the Lid Off of Everything That Keeps You in a Tin-Foil Hat – IOTW Report

Conspiracy Theorists of the Country Unite – A Vote For Trump Means an Outsider is Going to Blow the Lid Off of Everything That Keeps You in a Tin-Foil Hat

Wednesday, 17 February 2016, 22:47 BFH Uncategorized 51

In this clip, Trump implies that when he’s president we’ll find out who was really responsible for 9-11, because there are secret papers that he, I presume, will be publishing.

I think appealing to the Coast to Coast crowd, and securing that vote, is a wise move.

maxresdefault

I look forward to finding out what happened to DB Cooper.

51 Comments on Conspiracy Theorists of the Country Unite – A Vote For Trump Means an Outsider is Going to Blow the Lid Off of Everything That Keeps You in a Tin-Foil Hat

  4. He may pick up some of these whacko’s. Good for him. Trumps appeals is the “I’m mad as hell vote”. And the “Fuck it” vote. And the “Clear all the bastards out”. FYI that’s not why he’s currently getting mine.

  6. Architects and engineers for 911 truth. Google it. They explain in scientific terms why the official story is physically impossible. They don’t theorize about who or why just point out the science. There are thousands of architects and engineers who have signed the petition for a new investigation.

    Go Trump.

  17. So is this what we can expect every time Trump makes some lunatic statement, that he’s doing it to play to the “crazies” in order to get their votes? This is going to involve carrying a lot of water for some folks.

    Emotion Trumps Intellect !!!

  19. Loco. They both work at the Bunnie Ranch in Nevada. All the hookers endorsed Hillary because they’re use to getting screwed. Oh yea, women’s rights. Next week Hillary talks like a hooker. True story.

  22. JPM, that’s long been dismissed as bull shit. People that have accomplished as much as Trump will have a history. What your bible thumper achieved? And actually I don’t care. Right now I’m voting Trump twice because I want this establishment play ground burned down. I don’t really care who you vote for. If it’s Cruz, your guy will lose. You clearly don’t live in any high tech sector of the US. If you did maybe you would have a better grasp on what it’s going to take to bring this country back.

  24. Anybody that drives the Democrat party core AND the Republican party core into seizures, is worth voting for, just for the entertainment value.

    If you vote for the evil lying witch, the communist, either of the two illegal aliens, or the polled Texas steer, nothing will change for the better. It won’t really matter which of them is in office, because their policies are dictated to all of them by Wall Street. Even the communist.

    If you vote for Trump, it’s likely nothing will change for the better anyway, but it will at least be fun to watch.

  26. http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2016/02/to-understand-trump-you-have-to.html

    The average Republican voter is not a policy expert. Like Trump, he’s often learning about some of these things for the first time. Trump is excellent at capturing that bar/barbershop angry reaction and it may even be completely authentic. His responses are much more relatable than that of the politician or the expert who already understands the issue. But reacting isn’t leadership. Leaders are supposed to understand the issue. And when you can’t know everything, you need to work from firm principles.

    Here some conservatives object that Trump channels a conservative outrage machine, rather than conservative principles. And they’re probably right. He isn’t the only candidate in the race doing that. Conservatives won their victories by mobilizing outrage, not through position papers. Conservative candidates in the race have turned to the right because of pressure from the base.

    The trouble with Trump though is that he has no positions, only reactions. Beyond the outrage, his actual plans grow vague or backtrack. Obama loves calling his think tank leftist plans “common sense”. Trump’s plans actually are common sense, but they’re a common sense produced by some combination of FOX News, unknown websites and chats with some of his friends.

    And they’re liable to change depending on whom he talks to and what he reads and watches.

    What are Trump’s plans for health care? The details are vague. But they’re going to be whatever he thinks is a common sense solution. And the same thing is true all the way down the line.

    But at the same time dismissing Trump’s political skills is foolish and wrong. Trump has managed to do what no Republican in fifteen years had accomplished.

    There’s a simple fact that is key to understanding why Trump is winning. He’s the first Republican presidential candidate since Bush II to lay out a positive, specific and easy to understand plan for making things better. Cruz has plan for eliminating everything Obama did. Rubio has a vague plan for being really positive about America. Jeb Bush can barely articulate a message at all.

    Bush II’s compassionate conservatism was a mess. But the point isn’t who is right. The point is what works. Ever since Obama’s victory, I have argued that Republicans desperately need a positive agenda that connects with working class Americans who are worried about the economy.

    Whether or not Trump’s plan would work in real life is also not the point. The messaging is.

    Trump is labeled as a destructive candidate, yet he’s the only one to have grasped the most basic principle of politics, which is that you have to tell people how you will improve their lives in a way that is easy for them to understand and remember. Trump has done that. His rivals haven’t.

    Republican dysfunction and left-wing extremism made Trump’s candidacy happen. And that’s usually how Republicans get ahead in New York. Trump is doing nationally what successful Republican candidates do locally, bypass a broken New York party organization and make their own campaign happen. Giuliani did it. So did Bloomberg, despite having zero conservative credentials.

    In New York, the GOP is not going to make your campaign happen. You have to make your campaign happen, often by fighting an apathetic and rotten GOP establishment, while doing everything on your own. Trump is just running the same type of campaign nationally.

    Overall, Trump becomes much easier to understand if you understand New York.

    Tough talking socially liberal, fiscally conservative, sorta Republican candidates who operate outside the party bubble and push the rhetoric as hard as they can through the other side are the norm here.

    New York values recently became a controversy. Even though New Yorkers don’t like Trump (his
    negative approval rating is in the seventies), he’s a perfect representative of a particular type that is independent, drifting between parties, that believes in strong leadership, abroad and at home, that wants more social services, but lower taxes, a strong military, but without the nation building, that has no strong religious attachments, but a certain sense of public decency, that sounds working class while running a successful business, and that gets his view of the world from the New York Post and the Daily News morning paper reads. There are contradictions and hypocrisies in that mix, but also a set of values, if not ideas. It’s a Democratic-Republican mix that may sometimes vote for Democrats, but that watches FOX News, because it’s the closest thing to a fit for its worldview.

    The rise of Trump is not that baffling if you understand that dysfunction, national, movement and party, has consequences. And in this case, the consequence is that the 2016 election is being dominated by New York candidates and worldviews. New York Values are a difficult thing to describe and boil down. But it does seem as if New York Values will determine this election.

  30. The fact is, if everybody that is in the game hadn’t fucked up everything as bad as they have, Trump wouldn’t even be in the picture. We are in a hell of a spot, we have to think out of the box to get out. Can Trump do worse?

  33. I really despise the Democrats and what they did to this country. Trump has been a huge Democrat donor his whole life. That either makes him one of them or it makes him corrupt because he expects corruption favors for those transactions.

  39. Trump is a great business man on a game show. In the real world, not so much.

    OK, you’ve just proven your self not worth arguing with. Please vote Cruz. He’s your guy for a reason.

  47. Well there are plenty of out-there conspiracy theories about 9-11 of course and there is plenty of stuff out there re: Bin Laden and his link to 9-11 and his fate. But for the sake of this thread I’m not going to point them out, you have google as well.

    My only intent here is to point out the non-toinfoil-hat legit problems with the official 9-11 explanation. The video above is a great starting point – completely devoid of tin or foil or hats.

  48. Thank you Bob. I have researched and studied these facts for almost four yeas.
    Waking up to the facts was shattering in ways I cannot describe. It is much easier
    not to research but in my case too many things that the 9-11 commission presented made zero sense.

    One day many of the folks who are dismissing this info will come around.

  50. Well Bob, I too am an engineer.
    I too have done my own research.

    I do find 9/11 Truthers fascinating, I must admit.
    I enjoy watching them try and put puzzle pieces together from dissimilar puzzles, for the distinct desire to create a narrative that doesn’t exist.

    It is unfortunate that 19 hijackers were 75% successful in their quest for massive destruction.
    The fact that they caught the ‘fat cat’ sleeping was not a major surprise, nor did it require a conspiracy that included our government.
    Our government is sloppy, bloated, corrupt, but not 9/11 contributors. A case for negligence can be made, however.

  51. Hey, LBS –

    You have no intention of watching the AE911 video, do you?

    The video is not about the hijackers nor about who “did it”.

    It is saying that the buildings did not fall down due to “office fires” or “jet fuel”. The problem is that the 911 commission report and the NIST report tries to explain the free-fall complete destruction of the 3 WTC buildings to fires.

    The architects and structural engineers who design buildings and analyze building failures for a living say that the “official story” of WHY they fell is wrong.

    The terrorists and the planes is a given. Why the buildings fell down is the problem.

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.